Totally disagree. I own both an i4 and a Lucid Pure AWD. I have no axe to grind and honestly love both cars.
There is nothing wrong with repurposing a proven ICE platform for an EV if you’re OK with somewhat cramped rear seating. Not everyone needs a cavernous rear seat. Some even prefer driving a smaller car for its inherent benefits. My RWD i4 has a range of over 300 miles, significantly outperforming EPA estimates as most German cars do. Efficiency of over 4mi/kWh is not difficult at all in nice weather. The car handles beautifully, as most reviews will attest to. In fact the handling is better than my Lucid, partly because of its excellent chassis dynamics (riding on that proven, legacy ICE platform) and partly because it’s smaller and more nimble than the Lucid.
Quality? I can only hope my Lucid measures up to the tank-like quality of my i4. Nearly 2 years of ownership and over 17,000 miles with not one single issue. Hardware & software are terrific. Not a single squeak, creak or groan nor any issues with software. You couldn’t ask for a better ownership experience.
If legacy ICE platforms bother you in an EV, the below is upcoming for BMW in 2025. So there does seem to be a ‘cohesive vision’ at BMW. I think for a legacy automaker, their approach has made all the sense in the world. Start off with proven ICE designs that have stood the test of time, learn from that, and move on to dedicated EV platforms.
By 2025 my wife and I may be looking to replace her i4 and these new concept BMW EVs (which have already garnered some excellent reviews for design language), along with the future midsize Lucid, are top contenders at this point. Fun times!