Not to change the subject from wire size, but these results are pretty shocking. MoniputerLM said they drove 210 miles and the computer said they had 80 miles left (given the story I doubt it would've done all 80). That is only 290mi on a 450mi advertised car. I understand it was cold and it's more than any EV, but 300 mile range still isn't enough for me to switch from gas. 300 miles actually means planning on 210 mile trips (300 * 70%, for running between 10-80% charge), hence MoniputerLM's trip when he/she easily should have made the 300 mile trip. I have a reservation for a Grand Touring and got the email to confirm. I have a test drive scheduled next weekend and I'm going to do my best to get some brief data. But if I can only plan on 230 miles trips (500 advertised * 65% actual * 70% buffers), this isn't the car I've been waiting for. Particularly surprised because 70mph test are showing pretty close to 500mi. And I'm surprised this is "normal." I can't believe people are so happy with their Tesla's if base models are only getting 175 miles (267*65%), and they can really only pull off 122 miles for planning purposes.
And this doesn't just have implications of stopping more often. It also means each stop IS longer. Because 1 mile charged isn't 1 mile, it is only 0.65 miles. You think you're putting in 100 miles of range but it is only 65 miles. So you need to charge longer too.
Am I overreacting? At what point do you get to claim the car is a lemon and send it back or is there fine print saying the car may only get 50-60% of its advertised range?