So a couple questions for the group
There are already adapters for CCS to NACS. Will equipping these on the Lucid allow for charging at Tesla without any other modifications?
Because of the voltage difference, you would be limited to 50kW charging. Is that a theoretical maximum or are you actually getting that ? For example at 150kW EA chargers, I'm lucky to get 85 kW and even then I think it's slow. So getting 50kW would not be much worse than EA.
If it's a marketing thing, I guess Lucid could provide an adapter so that the cars can be said to be "NACS compatible", if that sells more cars. It would probably be rarely used and could be provided/sold for earlier models which would cost less than retrofitting.
Be careful about declaring a "winner" for the charging standard - look what has happened to the apple lightning charger!
The actual charging rate will be in the mid 40kW range. The car will take up to 50kW but once conversion losses along with battery thermal management are accounted for, approximately 45kW will be going into the battery.
I used to think this as well, but unfortunately not.
It's not a simple software limitation, there actually controls and other protocols on Tesla's side that they did not account for in the chargers. That's why magic dock Tesla stations exist and why Tesla couldn't simply do a software update to make Tesla support CCS vehicles.
Thank you. So just checked with a level 2 charger - pulls 8-9kW with an estimated 30mi/hr of charging. So 5X that (40-45kW) would give 150mi/hr? Wouldn't normally go for that unless the situation was really bad....
So a couple questions for the group
There are already adapters for CCS to NACS. Will equipping these on the Lucid allow for charging at Tesla without any other modifications?
The only working Supercharger adapters are the ones kept at the Supercharger stalls called Magic Dock and you have to use Tesla's app. You cannot take the Magic Dock home. Tesla doesn't sell it.
You can buy an adapter from a non-Tesla source, but it doesn't work because Tesla protocol would detect that you are not using Magic Dock and your car's company has not signed the NACS deal.
Because of the voltage difference, you would be limited to 50kW charging. Is that a theoretical maximum or are you actually getting that ? For example at 150kW EA chargers, I'm lucky to get 85 kW and even then I think it's slow. So getting 50kW would not be much worse than EA.
Consumer Reports did it during the cold winter while the snow was still on the ground and got only 49 instead of 50kW:
“I was limited to 49kW on all charge attempts, both with and without preconditioning the battery,” Alex said. “I suspect this is a result of Lucid’s 900-volt charging system, which can only accept 50kW from older, legacy 400-volt charging networks.” Lucid claims that under ideal conditions, the Air can add 200 miles of range in about 12 minutes of charging. It would have taken well over an hour to add the same amount of range at that 49 kW rate.
If it's a marketing thing, I guess Lucid could provide an adapter so that the cars can be said to be "NACS compatible", if that sells more cars. It would probably be rarely used and could be provided/sold for earlier models which would cost less than retrofitting.
I used to think this as well, but unfortunately not.
It's not a simple software limitation, there actually controls and other protocols on Tesla's side that they did not account for in the chargers. That's why magic dock Tesla stations exist and why Tesla couldn't simply do a software update to make Tesla support CCS vehicles.
Lucid emphasizes the convenience of slow home charging and de-emphasizes the hype of fast charging.
"It's really important to get more overnight AC [alternating-current charging, also known as Level 2] infrastructure for those who live in apartment complexes or street park. There's too much emphasis on DC fast charging."
Sorry, I should clarify. I was talking about the High Voltage NACS cars, which only Hyundai is. I stated that mercedes was not a high voltage electric car, leaving the egmp platform mates the only HV cars using NACS>
Sorry, I should clarify. I was talking about the High Voltage NACS cars, which only Hyundai is. I stated that mercedes was not a high voltage electric car, leaving the egmp platform mates the only HV cars using NACS>
German premium car manufacturer Mercedes-Benz will reportedly upgrade its EQE and EQS electric models to an 800-volt electrical system from 2025 onward, allowin
Polestar is showing a development prototype of the Polestar 5 in public for the first time at the 2022 Goodwood Festival of Speed (23-26 June). Polestar 5 is a high-performance electric 4-door GT with proper sports car credentials, and the production evolution of the Precept concept car first...
investors.polestar.com
GM is not 800V architecture, but it is compatible with both 400 and 800V with a decent rate (350kW at 800V, 250kW at 400V).
German premium car manufacturer Mercedes-Benz will reportedly upgrade its EQE and EQS electric models to an 800-volt electrical system from 2025 onward, allowin
Polestar is showing a development prototype of the Polestar 5 in public for the first time at the 2022 Goodwood Festival of Speed (23-26 June). Polestar 5 is a high-performance electric 4-door GT with proper sports car credentials, and the production evolution of the Precept concept car first...
investors.polestar.com
GM is not 800V architecture, but it is compatible with both 400 and 800V with a decent rate (350kW at 800V, 250kW at 400V).
Thank you for the correction. I was not aware that mercedes was going to switch. I wonder how they will handle that upgrade, same car with different batteries or just an all new EQS model? Or maybe discontinue the s class and replace it with a new EQS?(as mercedes has been planning)
Thank you for the correction. I was not aware that mercedes was going to switch. I wonder how they will handle that upgrade, same car with different batteries or just an all new EQS model? Or maybe discontinue the s class and replace it with a new EQS?(as mercedes has been planning)
I do a lot of road trips. On I10 from Houston to California there are only Tesla and Electrify America charging stations. Without both options you can get stranded. I would glad use any charger available rather than being stuck, so in that situation, it doesn't matter what voltage the charger is, or weather it optimizes the car's capabilities, you just want enough juice to get to the next location. Chargers are at least 100 miles apart. With availability of NACS, we'd have another option which at times could be hugely useful. Also, along that route, EA mostly has 4 chargers per station while Tesla has 8 to 40 at those same locations. EA has a waiting line and Tesla has openings. I think the real reason that Lucid hasn't switched to NACS is because of the CEOs personal grudge with Musk and that's hurting Lucid's customers.
My gut feeling is I don't like nacs because it's the whole industry bowing to a Tesla lead push even more, like apple with their headphone jacks.
But my desire to be able to charge overrides all of that. Tired of waiting on broken chargers and showing up and seeing a line of cars with just 4 bays. Give me a nacs adapter!