YesDoes it support the 80A charge rate on 100A circuit? The cord in the picture doesn’t look large enough caliber to do that. Looks like the typical 48Amp cable.
YesDoes it support the 80A charge rate on 100A circuit? The cord in the picture doesn’t look large enough caliber to do that. Looks like the typical 48Amp cable.
Yes. I'm getting mine this afternoon and will compare the handling of the Lucid's 80A cable to my Chargepoint's 48A cable.Does it support the 80A charge rate on 100A circuit? The cord in the picture doesn’t look large enough caliber to do that. Looks like the typical 48Amp cable.
It’s actually thinner than my Wallbox Pulsar Plus cable but handles 80A. Wild.Yes. I'm getting mine this afternoon and will compare the handling of the Lucid's 80A cable to my Chargepoint's 48A cable.
That is amazing. My clipper creek 80 cable is hugely.It’s actually thinner than my Wallbox Pulsar Plus cable but handles 80A. Wild.
That is amazing. My clipper creek 80 cable is hugely.
Yeah I have my crimper and this was a solid CAT6 cable; just wasn’t worth it for the 100mbit haha.Thanks for the info. It's typical to just cut a cross-slit in the ethernet grommet and push a cable through. You'd want to use a length of solid wire ethernet cable; patch cords are made of stranded wire and will not work with standard crimp-on RJ45 plugs. I have a crimp tool if anyone is masochistic enough to want to borrow it.
@borski I can make you a good deal on one or two Unifi nano-hd APs; I'm going to pull my unifiy stuff soon and replace it with Google's new Nest 6e blobs.
Nope, not yet.@borski so no indication of when bi-directional capability will be functional? thanks.
Hopefully, your cable won’t wind up looking twisted like the one at the service center, because I can see some wavy patterns in yours. Picture of service center charger and wavy cable:
View attachment 5911
My car draws no more than 17kW on a 19.2kW "feed." I think the rest of the power is used to keep the battery cool and run the electronics. I don't think that charging is 100% efficient. I think the Lucid displays the actual power going into the pack, the rest is part of the inefficiency.Different chargers entirely. Cable feels very sturdy. Setup was quick on wifi, and easy.
No ability to schedule charge yet or app integration, but it does appear to have OCPP and was pulling ~77 amps / 17-19 kW (I assume because my car was already at a high SOC).
Forgot to mention that it also depends on your voltage. 240V*80A=19.2kW. Many homes run below this voltage, especially when there are other loads in the house. The only time I get 240V is when it's sunny out and the solar system boosts the voltage.My car draws no more than 17kW on a 19.2kW "feed." I think the rest of the power is used to keep the battery cool and run the electronics. I don't think that charging is 100% efficient. I think the Lucid displays the actual power going into the pack, the rest is part of the inefficiency.
I think the kW display is the power coming into the car and the charging in mi/hr or mi/min is the power into the battery. If you turn on the remote climate while charging, the kW in does not change but the mi/hr decreases.I think the Lucid displays the actual power going into the pack, the rest is part of the inefficiency.
Glad to see I am not the only fool who can't understand why Lucid decided something we can't use or even see needs a name, but the thing that definitely needs a name is a meaningless, nebulous, acronym.so I understand about 25% of what is being said here; are we talking about the Wunderbox? which I don’t really know what that is…
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:Glad to see I am not the only fool who can't understand why Lucid decided something we can't use or even see needs a name, but the thing that definitely needs a name is a meaningless, nebulous, acronym.
View attachment 5938
...it's called Betty.
Just say Betty and everyone will know you are talking about the Lucid wall wart or LSMFT or whatever EVLSDMP3 you got.
View attachment 5937