What I heard from my advisor was that Pure is likely to be available to order at the "leg end of the year" Dec?, Which means, VIN assignment for the first Air Pure deliveries could be end of Feb and first deliveries could be 2 to 6 weeks later in Mar or Apr 2023.With Tourings now delayed till Q4 (so far), I would be surprised if any Pures get produced this year.
Everything is being punched back due to the factory issues. I posted months ago that even the reduced yea-end production numbers were not likely to be hit. While they didn’t reduce them further at the Q1 conference call, at some point there will have to be an day of reckoning about reality.What I heard from my advisor was that Pure is likely to be available to order at the "leg end of the year" Dec?, Which means, VIN assignment for the first Air Pure deliveries could be end of Feb and first deliveries could be 2 to 6 weeks later in Mar or Apr 2023.
Let’s see those May numbers…..https://www.arabnews.com/node/2087211/business-economy Looks like they are reporting monthly production data.
Lucid Motors delivers 300 EV units in April, to launch Air Pure later this year, CEO says
Not sure what they mean by launch. As a minimum, I would expect launch to mean available to order for reservation holders.
"Lucid Motors delivered 360 cars to consumers during the first quarter of 2022. In contrast, the company sold 300 vehicles last month alone." That is a 3x increase per month compared to last quarter. Let ius see if 1 month from now they will report more than 300 and get to 1000+ per month in 2 to 3 months to hit 12k this year.
I have driven a Tesla with the latest FSD in, of all places, Cupertino, where it should be fantastic... and it was terrifying. Regular phantom braking when approaching turns, regularly selecting the absolute center of roads that happened to not have lane markings, but also somehow managing to nearly hit a few trash cans along the way - it is not what I would describe as 'city ready.'Have you driven a Tesla with FSD? My current car is in the beta program and its really good. I'd love to see someone else (like Lucid) put forth a great solution that makes rapid progress, but I don't think slapping LIDAR on a car will solve the data collection and training shortcoming. Separately, there were tons of early adopter Model S owners that had mixed feelings on paying for FSD. Some were OK with contributing towards the future solution, others effectively went years without a proper beta offering.
Not trying to rain on anyone's parade, I justI think folks should be realistic about what DreamDrive Pro will offer and how quickly it will iterate towards autonomy.
How much % battery retention do the 10 year old Tesla Models have now? To lose 30% over 10 years / 100k mi from ideal charging habits is kinda bad but it's an technical challenge all EV makers have. Sucks.A few thoughts. First of all I believe Lucid guarantees the battery will have at least 70% after 10 years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first. Secondly, you will only want to charge to 100% for long planned trips and normally will want to charge to only 80% to help ensure battery life exceeds the guarantee. So on my Dream Performance which has a 450 mile range, when I charge to 80% I get an estimated 360 miles of range. Then assuming I will actually only get 80% of that my realistic mileage is 288 miles. So by upgrading to the GT with an assumed range of 500 miles your local driving range would be right around 320 miles which will more than adequate to go from Sacramento to the Bay Area or to Lake Tahoe without any range anxiety. For the Touring or Pure you'll be looking at around 250 miles which is also adequate but possibly more stressful?? Lastly you are correct there will be more charging stations in 5 years but most likely there will also be many more EV's on the road at any time so wait times could be lengthy.
Wikipedia states the battery pack in the Touring is 92kw while the Pure will be 88kw. If the AWD Pure has the same drive train as the Touring (620hp), it would seem probable that the range would be significantly less. Since range is the number 1 concern of EV owners, many individuals interested in the AWD Pure most likely would be extremely disappointed and reconsidering their purchase.
Range loss is due to a lot of factors, but the battery chemistry across models should be the same - this means the Pure shouldn't lose capacity any faster than any of the other models. Cycles (number of charges), heat (frequent level 3 charging), charge and discharge voltage, and the level at which the battery is charged to (letting it sit at low or high states of charge for long periods of time) can impact degradation.Hi all, has anyone heard that the Pure will lose some range if you decide to upgrade to the AWD? My main reason for switching from Tesla to Lucid is the value for the range
No, What size packs are in it? We don't have detail, but Peter's 30 min tech talk video on YT had a detail explanation of how the packs are made. He didn't mention the pack was smaller in the Pure vs Touring...I don't recall that. The P & T are just missing the 2 packs in the rear under your feet. Adding a second motor should not lower range, but look at the Ionic 5 RWD has more range than AWD, but this is LUCID not Hyundai and an AWD T has 620HP and AWD, so I would assume more range AWDHi all, has anyone heard that the Pure will lose some range if you decide to upgrade to the AWD? My main reason for switching from Tesla to Lucid is the value for the range
we sold our 2014 model S a couple of years ago - when it was 6 years old but had 110K miles and it had lost 15 miles out of 265 rated when new so about 6%. This was with quite a bit of supercharging due to our cross country trips and free supercharging.How much % battery retention do the 10 year old Tesla Models have now? To lose 30% over 10 years / 100k mi from ideal charging habits is kinda bad but it's an technical challenge all EV makers have. Sucks.
Everything I've seen on this forum says it definitely will notBut I don't think anyone can definitely state that Pure with AWD will = 620HP??
The bottom line is we don't know. I believe it's easily capable of 620HP, but whether Lucid decides to software limit the power to a lower number is still TBD. For me, I want 600hp and 0-60 in 3.5 or less. If they haircut the Touring by a lot, it may change my decision to wait for the car.Everything I've seen on this forum says it definitely will not
My guts tell me Pure AWD will be 480-540hp. More likely a bit higher than 480hp to make it a more attractive upgrade. 620hp Pure AWD will make Touring less attractive and Touring is more profitable for them. Lucid can match or make AGT Performance be faster than Dream Performance but they won't since that would make the Dreams less special + angry Dream owners. A bit different case from Pure AWD vs Touring but makes sense to not match the two.
Which I dont disagree with, but not sure how that really relates to my comment since the main topic is about current trim selections and specs that are currently being produced/soon to be produced for this generation of Air and not 2024 or 2050 models. If I buy the latest highest end iPhone I expect it to be that case for at least some time. I'd be upset if in one month they surprisingly came out with higher spec with same or lower price. If the new release was due to supply issue or a fix then thats more acceptable. There will be upgrades and improvements, but companies tend to respect or follow some sort of product cycle / timeline to not upset recent customers (among other reasons).Technology always gets better and cars get faster. DE owners know this and a 2022 model will not be the fastest and best Air. It's a limited edition car.