I agree that the last couple of days is the first time that I have had second thoughts about my GT purchase.
I have decided that I have to assess this car one of two ways.
1. Although the car absolutely delivers in dynamics and comfort, it falls well short of the initial build quality that Rawlinson promised over and over. Thus I regret buying it.
- or -
2. It's a first effort that was delivered with no more quality issues than the top-of-the-line Tesla we just bought almost a decade after Tesla began production. Thus, I can live with its shortcomings in the absence of anything else of equivalent performance, room, luxury, and style.
My addiction for powerful EV drivetrains has led me down the path of excusing issues I would never have countenanced with my earlier ICE cars. (After the abysmal reliability records of my 1997 Corvette and my 2004 Mercedes SL55 AMG, I left both brands and have never seriously considered going back.) I now find myself excusing Lucid for build quality issues just as I did/do Tesla.
Thus far, Lucid's service response has been solid and reassuring. However, that was still the case with Tesla when I bought my first Tesla in 2015. Then, along came the Model 3, and Tesla service went over a cliff and is still lying twisted on the canyon floor. If the scenario repeats at Lucid with the introduction of the SUV to a wider customer base, I'll be done with startup manufacturers for once and all. There is apparently no such thing as building a reliable car right from the outset. Here I sit wondering if driving this $170,000 car will scrape more paint off the bumper and when the license plate will go flying off.