This constant derailing of threads is a waste of my time, moderators time, and any member who is coming to get feedback about a specific topic. It seems there is no end even though we've asked multiple times nicely to keep threads on topic.
For real. Sorry, I was too distracted by the music, massaging seats, serenely spacious comfortable environment, head turning looks and phenomenal driving experience to worry about the nuances of the 5 cycle EPA test. It’s like those trolls who keep bringing up the stock price all over the internet. Obviously not many own the car, but I also seriously doubt a single Lucid owner would only love their car if the stock price was over $20/share right now. But go read TWITTER/X and you'd think everyone drives a stock symbol to work, not a car.
Are you here to save the environment or not? Shame!
Agreed, when I am driving around on a typical day I don't concern myself with this however when road tripping efficiency is important so I can get the longest possible range out of the car
These numbers were achieved at reasonable ambient temperatures (75-85F) with no additional drain (AC or heater). If your driving environment requires AC/heater or a hotter/colder climate, you must further derate these numbers.
Also note, this data, only applies to the locale in which it was taken. It does not include extra weight, tire pressure, head or tail wind, or elevation changes.
The only weight in the car was me and my dog, and my backpack~270lb total. Tire pressure is Lucid's spec'ed 49 PSI. No appreciable wind. Numbers are averages from several drives on I-10.
And yes, the tires were nitrogen-filled.
As for elevation change, in my most recent drive, I drove from Paradise Valley AZ (1,086 ft elevation) on I-10 and stopped to charge in San Bernadino (1,049 ft elevation). to charge after 330 miles. Yes, there were some up-and-down elevations along the route. I monitored the efficiencies but saw no tangible deviations of note. So, 37' of favorable elevation change net!
What is considered appreciable wind? A 5mph headwind will make quite a difference in efficiency.
No wind I can feel. Did not monitor/record the exact wind speed. No gusts I experienced.
Attached is the actual charge receipt from EA. I blanked out the personal info. But you can do your own calculation:No wind I can feel. Did not monitor/record the exact wind speed. No gusts I experienced.
I should also note that my recent drive was non-stop from Paradise Valley to San Bernadino. Therefore there were no stop-and-go breaks.
Yes, it was superior bladder control but I can't get into the techniques as the moderators will have a fit for me getting off topic!
I don't want to burden this thread with nuance data. Below is a link you can go look up all the pertinent historical data of my route (Paradise Valley to San Bernadino).
This is what I was saying yesterday. With the amount of driving some of us do, every day is a road trip. So, obviously, the importance and impact of range and efficiency are much greater
