I pretty much disagree with the tone of most of your posts BUT, those two sentences ring true for me. I've said this before - Lucid relied too much on ex-Tesla managers. It's almost like they thought they could ship out product that didn't meet their gap standards because it was acceptable at Tesla and the public pretty much accepted that would be the case when they got their Teslas and it would be fixed post delivery. When people criticized Tesla QA by saying things like "That never would have left the factory at Toyota", the same could be said with Lucid. Why Lucid didn't catch and stop shipment of cars out of tolerance is something I don't understand. Again, maybe the Tesla mindset of fixing it at the service center. Build quality is important to me - infotainment software, not so much. At current levels, I can give Lucid a pass on infotainment/ADAS...I found it hard to believe they shipped Dreams with what they had back in 2021. I hope that with the improvements/focus on QA at the factory, I can give Lucid a pass on build quality now. It gives me hope that recent deliveries haven't mentioned issues with panel/trunk alignment. Even
@Sandvinsd who said his car better be perfect accepted his car's build quality.
At the same time, you do focus on the negative - which is your prerogative but keep in mind what
@MPawelek wrote:
"There is actually a lot more whining on this site about minor deficiencies in the Air than any other automotive site I am on and believe me there are some really f’ed up other cars out there….."
I'm definitely not condoning dishonesty but who in their right mind would buy a car from someone that said "Our build quality is on par with Tesla but our software is years behind"? Of course, there are advantages Lucid has over Tesla but that pretty much sums up their shortcomings from before the changes to QA/PDI at the factory.