Actually you are technically correct!
In my job-sector of space systems design engineering, protection, and orbital analysis, no one almost ever uses Apple, which is interesting; actually, I think there was
one guy who just retired had an extra iPhone burner because his granddaughter used it and wanted to relate to her.
In the sector of medical fields, I've noticed Apple seems to be more prevalent. I've only met one other Apple fan in real life in-person aside from going to a doc. Most of my circles prefer flagship Google or flagship Samsung Android OS because you can root and code it easily for the casual hobbyist and build your own Apps, etc.. to your needs. I believe it is possible to get into "Guru-Mode" and get into Apple devices and code it but it requires some fuss. The audio fidelity of the Apple DAC was unsatisfactory when I used an iPhone 14 for a while, but there are clever 3rd party workarounds. Instead of purchasing Lightning Cable fixes, I gifted it to a friend. I mean, some people aren't tone-hounds, or can tell the difference between streaming MP3 and BlueRay-Audio discs just like some people can't tell the difference between 1987 Macallan 30-year scotch and Jim Beam, or Savage Coffee ground with Ode Fellow 2 SSP burrs as a home-pour-over using a Chemex vs. Starbucks Grande (with 3 pumps Pumpkin Spice corn syrup). If you have no ability to sense the difference, why go the extra mile? Apple is definitely an "easier" choice because there is the one option. Some people's senses cannot determine quality or marketed of "perceived quality" or "perceived elitism" as in the case of Tesla's branding, now souring in my opinion over time as some are lemony.
I found Apple products to be minimalist and constricting with little variation. I asked the retired guy why he prefered it and he said it was simple for him to use, and I can understand that.
The war of fruits vs. robots goes on! (LOL)
View attachment 26150