While I can understand your POV, it isn’t for everyone. What you are describing is geared towards a niche market, so I’ll second that with, there certainly isn’t anything else like it in the market.
I have an appointment with service just to make sure nothing is wrong, as it’s the absolute worst audio system in a premium auto from my experience. Doesn’t play loud/ you have to press buttons wheel 6-7 times just to get volume up- sounds flat- zero bass.I would agree as well, this stereo isn’t even comparable to car stereos that are even a class or two below what this car would be considered…we got my wife an XC90, and hers is louder and deeper than my pure.
This one is a real issue and it's not just you. I usually use the volume wheel in the center instead.you have to press buttons wheel 6-7 times just to get volume up
You may need the bass port fixed actually, it’s a known defect some vehicles had an issue with it being covered incorrectly. I had a loaner GT like that, the audio system was quite bad in comparison to my vehicle, which sounds more like a professional recording studio, with BALANCED bass, not crap your pants bass (provided your source material is high fidelity). Recently I thought I’d had a blown center rear speaker, turns out the deck lid had gotten a little loose possibly from my listening habits, and service fixed it quickly and it sounds fantastic again. As for the volume wheel calibration in the Lucid, unlike other cars, it’s calibrated to professional near field monitoring levels. SPL tests have born this out. See the section on the car audio levels here: https://www.lucidupdates.com/faq.htmlI have an appointment with service just to make sure nothing is wrong, as it’s the absolute worst audio system in a premium auto from my experience. Doesn’t play loud/ you have to press buttons wheel 6-7 times just to get volume up- sounds flat- zero bass.
If this is really the set up and I’m not having issues with mine, I can’t imagine how anyone who listens to a vast array of music can think it’s good …… but to each their own but to me it’s awful is my take thus far.
I’m not saying it’s a good workaround, but you can also use the slider in settings.This one is a real issue and it's not just you. I usually use the volume wheel in the center instead.
This is my guess. Also, every single vehicle will have this problem - it’s just a matter of time. That tape it ships with (unless they’ve changed it, which they may have), will unstick. When it does, bass will sound awful.You may need the bass port fixed actually, it’s a known defect some vehicles had an issue with it being covered incorrectly. I had a loaner GT like that, the audio system was quite bad in comparison to my vehicle, which sounds more like a professional recording studio
I wasn’t aware of this. Given the likelihood of this happening, do you have a picture of where the problematic area is? I seem to recall someone posting it sometime ago.This is my guess. Also, every single vehicle will have this problem - it’s just a matter of time. That tape it ships with (unless they’ve changed it, which they may have), will unstick. When it does, bass will sound awful.
First thing to check.
Post in thread '[RESOLVED] Does your front footwell woofer work properly?'I wasn’t aware of this. Given the likelihood of this happening, do you have a picture of where the problematic area is? I seem to recall someone posting it sometime ago.
If you claim the Lucid has a tight, realistic low end, how is that possible when the system lacks low bass entirely? It's difficult to understand how it can be described as tight and realistic when the necessary deep bass isn't present, with only midbass being offered.If you’re used to pounding, exaggerated bass, the SSPro is not going to please. However if you’re looking for more precision in your sound, with a tight, realistic low end, then SSPro will definitely please.
If you claim the Lucid has a tight, realistic low end, how is that possible when the system lacks low bass entirely? It's difficult to understand how it can be described as tight and realistic when the necessary deep bass isn't present, with only midbass being offered.
“Realistic” means to me that it would approximate what was heard in the recording studio, and most of the time is mixed on monitors with a drop off at 32hz. It’s tough to tell what you’re trying to communicate without specifying frequencies (“mid bass”? sorry I don’t know what is meant by that), but generally in music recording studios “low” bass, which I’m guessing you mean frequencies below 40hz, are viewed as a trouble maker as the long wavelengths can muddy up a mix and cause phase cancellation all over the place, actually obscuring bass guitar and kick drum frequencies a mixer might want to emphasize. Those low frequencies of 40hz and lower actually have a 3 meter wavelength or longer, which is why you’ll hear bass from automobile subwoofers louder outside of the car than inside, as what you’re hearing inside the car is not even one cycle of the waveform but a combination of cabin gain effect, resonance and harmonics. That bass that you “feel” from car subwoofers is fine, and in larger spaces like a movie theater or club then you actually CAN experience those low frequencies as those spaces can accurately accommodate the longer wavelengths, but not hearing something in a car the mixer didn’t put in the mix is not a fault of the audio system in the car. Too often people never hear the music or film mix accurately to begin with, and this was an enormous source of aggravation back when I was working on film sound, as in one example we had one director play back part of a mix in his truck which had a super hyped subwoofer and he insisted on having us change the mix in the re-recording stage to make it sound more like his truck. We finally weaned him off his ridiculously inaccurate listening environment and sent a tech out to upgrade his home theater and that became his reference for what it might sound like outside of the studio. So people expect all this woofer heavy bass that was never there in the studio and then say it sucks if they don’t hear what the mixer never put in there. . Don’t get me wrong, I love huge bass, that’s why I posted the link for the INXS Atmos mix of “Mediate” as an example, as that was deliberately put in there in that version, I just don’t think people have an accurate reference point for what “realistic” means as their point of reference is often an over hyped improperly calibrated car audio system. The Lucid audio system is actually the ONLY system I’ve heard in any car where the volume is calibrated just like the fader on a mixing console, where “zero” = 79db in a near field listening environment, and max volume is 12db more.If you claim the Lucid has a tight, realistic low end, how is that possible when the system lacks low bass entirely? It's difficult to understand how it can be described as tight and realistic when the necessary deep bass isn't present, with only midbass being offered.
Very true. Some people prefer different styles of audio, and Lucid happens to tend to people wanting one thing while another system might tend to other groups of people. Sound is ALWAYS subjective.Here’s something I only found out after doing 2 aftermarket builds.
Any system tuned to flat response in a car is not going to sound good. This is because of all the reflections present as well as the noise environment driving.
While flat response might be “as it was in the studio on monitors” it doesn’t means it’s enjoyable in a car because as car isn’t a studio or even a treated listening room.
So when we say tuned to flat with any aftermarket tuner there is room for interpretation. So any build you have has the tuner’s interpretation of what a flat experience would be after all the car environment issues.
What does that mean for my experience?
I found the stock sspro system to lack bass in normal listening environments, e.g while driving. When I say bass I mean bass guitar and cello ranges which fundamental frequencies span between what would be classically left to a sub and a midbass driver.
There’s a philosophical argument that goes around which is do you want music reproduction to be accurate or enjoyable?
The reality is, no matter how expensive the system in a car getting to accurate is hard just by virtue of the fact that the dimensional constraints of the car makes it hard to create a wide enough soundstage to be “realistic” like you might have in a proper listening room with something as simple as two multi driver stereo towers.
So in car, I just want to be able to enjoy it.
That’s a fair point, enjoyment is key. I’m far enough removed from film sound now where I can actually enjoy movies again rather than analytically dissecting them noticing every last imperfection, which then basically ruins the experience of any sub-masterpiece level film. It would be disheartening knowing what the mix sounded like in the studio and then seeing the film in some sub par theater at a mall and realizing at least 50% of the effort you put into it was totally inaudible. Cue the old adage about seeing how the sausage is made will ruin sausage for you. But for me the car’s audio system when playing back good fidelity audio sources in either 2 channel or Atmos is very enjoyable, to the point where I wonder if some owner’s cars are defective, or they’re listening on Spotify or streaming over Bluetooth, or their point of reference is a LOUD hyped bass heavy car, in which case the Lucid is not that so I can understand how it doesn’t meet their requirements.Here’s something I only found out after doing 2 aftermarket builds.
Any system tuned to flat response in a car is not going to sound good. This is because of all the reflections present as well as the noise environment driving.
While flat response might be “as it was in the studio on monitors” it doesn’t means it’s enjoyable in a car because as car isn’t a studio or even a treated listening room.
So when we say tuned to flat with any aftermarket tuner there is room for interpretation. So any build you have has the tuner’s interpretation of what a flat experience would be after all the car environment issues.
What does that mean for my experience?
I found the stock sspro system to lack bass in normal listening environments, e.g while driving. When I say bass I mean bass guitar and cello ranges which fundamental frequencies span between what would be classically left to a sub and a midbass driver.
There’s a philosophical argument that goes around which is do you want music reproduction to be accurate or enjoyable?
The reality is, no matter how expensive the system in a car getting to accurate is hard just by virtue of the fact that the dimensional constraints of the car makes it hard to create a wide enough soundstage to be “realistic” like you might have in a proper listening room with something as simple as two multi driver stereo towers.
So in car, I just want to be able to enjoy it.
Perhaps incorporating the full range of low frequencies, extending down to 20 Hz, alongside a parametric equalizer or a high-pass filter with an adjustable cutoff between 40 and 20 Hz and an adjustable slope, easily achievable through DSP, would make everyone happy. This solution, combined with the standard low, mid, and high-frequency controls, could effectively address the issue. The primary concern with the Lucid Air is that the "subwoofer" in the trunk, which is more accurately a woofer, fails to adequately reproduce low frequencies. Compared to other luxury vehicles I've owned or rented, the bass performance of the Lucid Air is significantly lacking. I'm curious about the specifics of the Lucid woofer; if there's a more competent subwoofer with ultra-long excursion capabilities to achieve deeper bass response available that matches the impedance, I would prefer a direct replacement over installing an additional amplifier/subwoofer setup, as some have opted for. After all, measurements don't lie. To my ears, it seems like the bass begins to drop off around 50 Hz, and the cutoff is quite steep, although I haven't taken precise measurements.Very true. Some people prefer different styles of audio, and Lucid happens to tend to people wanting one thing while another system might tend to other groups of people. Sound is ALWAYS subjective.
AFAIK, @copper was the only one who setup testing equipment to get actual measurements.Perhaps incorporating the full range of low frequencies, extending down to 20 Hz, alongside a parametric equalizer or a high-pass filter with an adjustable cutoff between 40 and 20 Hz and an adjustable slope, easily achievable through DSP, would make everyone happy. This solution, combined with the standard low, mid, and high-frequency controls, could effectively address the issue. The primary concern with the Lucid Air is that the "subwoofer" in the trunk, which is more accurately a woofer, fails to adequately reproduce low frequencies. Compared to other luxury vehicles I've owned or rented, the bass performance of the Lucid Air is significantly lacking. I'm curious about the specifics of the Lucid woofer; if there's a more competent subwoofer with ultra-long excursion capabilities to achieve deeper bass response available that matches the impedance, I would prefer a direct replacement over installing an additional amplifier/subwoofer setup, as some have opted for. After all, measurements don't lie. To my ears, it seems like the bass begins to drop off around 50 Hz, and the cutoff is quite steep, although I haven't taken precise measurements.
Just to confirm, you’ve listened to this Atmos track in Tidal HiFi Plus in the native car app still think the bass is lacking? https://tidal.com/track/222435050Perhaps incorporating the full range of low frequencies, extending down to 20 Hz, alongside a parametric equalizer or a high-pass filter with an adjustable cutoff between 40 and 20 Hz and an adjustable slope, easily achievable through DSP, would make everyone happy. This solution, combined with the standard low, mid, and high-frequency controls, could effectively address the issue. The primary concern with the Lucid Air is that the "subwoofer" in the trunk, which is more accurately a woofer, fails to adequately reproduce low frequencies. Compared to other luxury vehicles I've owned or rented, the bass performance of the Lucid Air is significantly lacking. I'm curious about the specifics of the Lucid woofer; if there's a more competent subwoofer with ultra-long excursion capabilities to achieve deeper bass response available that matches the impedance, I would prefer a direct replacement over installing an additional amplifier/subwoofer setup, as some have opted for. After all, measurements don't lie. To my ears, it seems like the bass begins to drop off around 50 Hz, and the cutoff is quite steep, although I haven't taken precise measurements.
Just to confirm, you’ve listened to this Atmos track in Tidal HiFi Plus in the native car app still think the bass is lacking? https://tidal.com/track/222435050
This one too? https://tidal.com/track/248428851
If you think it’s weak or poor definition after hearing those tracks, definitely call service to investigate the footwell ports to make sure they’re covered correctly. Not questioning your hearing, just making sure we’re speaking the same language and testing it first can help confirm.