I ended up needing to work in New Hampshire for the day, so why not try a “real world cold weather” efficiency test? I didn’t want to waste time getting there or on the way home, so I drove from Providence RI to Nashua NH with total disregard for speed limits and help from Waze and my Uniden detector, mostly 75-85mph, occasionally 90+, although there were a handful of slowdowns due to traffic. Ambient temps started at 19F and never went above 30F, 19” wheels at 49 cold PSI, climate set to 70F with heated seat and heated steering wheel. Efficiency was 3.5 mi/kwh in spite of the sub freezing temps and higher speeds, meaning total range in pretty cold temps at real world speeds is still almost 400 miles (3.5 x 112kwh = 392 miles), which is fantastic, and nearly what Edmunds achieved in their supposed real world test in the GT at normal temperatures where they got 430 or something like that. This provides support for the notion that the short-loop range tests these reviewers do are flawed, as they’ll do 6-8 loops of exits and re-entry and getting this heavy car up to speed from a slow down uses a LOT of kW. My “loop” was literally four ramp ups to highway speeds (one to get on the highway there, one to get on the highway back, and then the I95/I93 split near Boston requires slowing down to 25mph then rapid acceleration back to highway speeds to not get killed on the I95 merge). Of course around town efficiency in the Lucid is not all that special, for the very same reasons of getting the car up to any speed from a stop uses more energy than steady highway speed.