Welcome to Lucid owners club, you have clearly already been initiated into our dysFUNctional relationship with the car. It’s worth it, including the drama. There is literally nothing boring about Lucid Air or Gravity, for better or worse haha.
As a long-time Lucid owner, I'm not worried that Lucid won't eventually get these issues in hand or that we personally won't end up with a superbly-performing, solidly-built road machine . . . and this post is going to piss a lot of you off . . .
But as a stock holder in the company, I am getting seriously worried about the risks Lucid is taking with putting cars with so many hardware and software issues into customers' hands.
Every morning I get up and check to see if reviews from independent test drives of the Gravity are beginning to pop up on the internet. And by independent, I don't mean the carefully-curated events we have seen reflected in the highly-laudatory reviews we saw earlier in the year. And each day I'm relieved to see that none have yet emerged.
If the major reviewers get their hands on a recent production car at this point and have trouble with key fobs and key cards not working, seats rattling and squeaking, stray images floating in windshields, constant false alarms popping up. -- all things of which we have seen multiple reports on this thread -- then Lucid is going to have a major problem on its hands.
As much dismay as it would unleash among those anxiously waiting for their cars, I am starting to think Lucid would be wise to halt further deliveries until they can get better-functioning and more thoroughly-inspected Gravities out the door. This is turning into a game of Russian roulette, while we wait for "Consumer Guide", "Edmunds", or another widely-followed reviewer getting their hands on a Gravity with some of the problems being reported here. The Gravity is aimed at a much broader market than the Air was, and a lot of those buyers turn to more mainstream reviews than to "Hagerty" or "Throttle House" or other reviewers many of us on this forum prefer.
"Car & Driver" has already rated the Gravity the third-best mid-size EV SUV on the market (not a group with a lot of contenders), behind the BMW ix and the Cadillac Vistiq. And they have named the updated Taycan the EV of the Year, with the Gravity among a very long list of contenders. I'm wondering if part of the reason is that they are aware of some of these issues. Rank speculation on my part, of course . . . but falling behind a 4-year-old BMW model and a Cadillac EV that has garnered mixed reviews is not exactly where I was hoping or expecting the Gravity to land.
Most of the flak the Gravity has caught so far from the press is its high price and long list of options that many expected to be included at its price point. Adding quality issues is putting an awful lot of straw on the camel's back.