I don't even own an EV yet, but how is more chargers going to help a state that tells people on a holiday weekend to NOT charge their cars?
I understand needing more chargers but not when the infrastructure does not exist to actually use them.
I'm so goddamn sick of people saying stupid things like "CA says no more gas cars but then says not to charge EVs haha", they
never freaking said not to charge your cars at all.
They
literally said to charge your EVs
before 4pm and
after 9pm, so that the electricity demand for A/C can be met (because that's when it will be at its highest). This isn't difficult to look up. The official PDF is available, it's not like it's hidden. You
can read it yourself. And if you don't want to read it yourself, here's the relevant part:
Can you see that? It never said not to charge your cars "for the holiday weekend". It never said "don't charge your EVs at all".
Of course, non-Californians and certain politically affiliated people don't want to recognize that nuance and instead ran around telling the internet that CA is simultaneously banning the sale of gas cars but then telling you that you can't charge your EVs, and people like you lapped it all up without even thinking twice.
Guess what? Not only did we not get told "don't charge your EVs at all", because we listened, cut down our usage between 4 to 9pm, and didn't make a big fuss about it, most of California
managed to avoid rolling blackouts because the amount of energy we conserved made it possible.
Also, most people with EVs who charge at home
wouldn't even be effing charging during 4pm to 9pm during non-heatwave times, because they charge overnight when electricity is cheaper to begin with. But again, this kind of nuance doesn't sell clickbait BS headlines, so here we are.
So congrats, now that you know what the Flex Alert
actually said, go out into the world and try to correct the misinformation before it gets worse.