Or maybe it isn’t, and it is the defense of those without an argument to resort to
ad hominem attacks, which is a logical fallacy.
Attack the argument, not the person making it. And if you don’t have a good argument to make, that’s fine, but then politely bow out because ad hominems never move anything forward.
It is silly. That’s why it’s supposed to be fun.
Thanks.
Did you read anything I wrote?
The implication here is that we
don’t complain, so I’ll reiterate: it seems clear you didn’t read anything I wrote.
I have no idea. I’m not your wife.
I do assume that if your wife came home and gave you some bad news, like the grocery store was out of milk, you wouldn’t immediately go “you didn’t try hard enough, you should go to another store, you probably didn’t even look in the right section, and I’m surprised you even made it home with how dumb you are and how badly you drive” or you wouldn’t have a wife very much longer.
There are people on the other side of the comments you make. Some of them even work at Lucid, building the very car you want them to improve.
Attack the argument. Not the people. That shouldn’t be hard. If it is, reconsider your argument entirely.