A more fair comparison would be any given iPhone model with an Android phone in the same price range
Nope, because I’m comparing percentages of populations, not percentage of people with an expensive phone. Even if you were to do that, all it means is the already-low percentage of Android users that own a Lucid just got smaller, further disincentivizing building AA.
Otherwise, you'd merely be saying that people who have lower incomes may tend to buy less expensive phones, or that people who buy less expensive phones tend to have less income.
No, I’m saying that people who buy Lucids already own iPhones, as we have seen statistically. I am also saying that the average iPhone is more expensive than the average Android device. The percentage of Android devices that are expensive and own a Lucid are even smaller yet.
And if you want to compare a phone brand to an operating system, you'd have to include any devices running Android that are capable of making phone calls. That would include the computer that I'm typing this on, which costs more than any iPhone.
No, you don’t, because nobody is bringing their Chromebook into their car to be used for Android Auto. This is a strawman.
Otherwise you’d have to include my MacBook Pro, which can also make calls and send texts.
I was obviously not comparing hardware to an OS.
What's the average income of a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra buyer?
Probably pretty high. And the percentage of people that buy a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, relative to those that buy an iPhone, is pretty low.
But if people did stay away from cars for that reason, even if Android had 10% of the market, an 10% loss in customer base could put some companies out of business.
Right, but if your customer base is already 10% Android, that 10% additional loss doesn’t matter very much.