ICE vehicles don't have to meet their EPA rating because gas stations are everywhere
It's amazing how much infrastructure can improve in a whole century.
ICE vehicles don't have to meet their EPA rating because gas stations are everywhere
That is awesome. I think BMW tends to beat out the EPA projections. I wish other cars, especially EV ones would do that too. Always a great when that happens.Actually my BMW i4 e40, on 19” wheels, consistently gets over the EPA estimate by a significan margin. My lifetime average stands at 4.1 mi/kWh which is in excess of a 320 mile range. The EPA estimate for the e40 on 19” wheels is 282 miles. My experience is far from an isolated one, as many i4 owners are exceeding the EPA estimates. The car has turned out to be very efficient.
I still have a reservation for the Pure, but at this point, having had zero issues with the i4 and really enjoying its ride & handling, I’m becoming more and more dubious about making a switch. I seriously doubt the Pure will offer me much greater range in real world driving.
My wife wants to hold on to her hybrid as she’s reluctant to have 2 electric cars between the two of us. So getting her into a Pure isn’t going to happen.
On the flip side, neither my e-Tron, MS or I-Pace managed to meet their EPA estimates. So there’s that.
I never doubted 0-60. How does it do 60-80 (i.e., passing on a country road)?Yeah, well 0-60 in the high 4 second area is good enough for me. I’ve also had experience with EVs with RWD (my MS), so I wasn’t at all deterred by that. If I lived in areas with frequent heavy snows and had no second car as an alternative drive, my decision might have been different.![]()
I really don’t know the time, other than to say it feels ‘quick’, but perhaps some review might shed some light on that.I never doubted 0-60. How does it do 60-80 (i.e., passing on a country road)?
Currently in our Forester, at 60mph you floor it and give it a few moments to hit 65, change lanes, continue flooring it, and by the time the pass is complete, decelerate from 70 or (75 if going downhill). Meanwhile the cabin sounds like an old Starbucks coffee grinder.I never doubted 0-60. How does it do 60-80 (i.e., passing on a country road)?
I venture to guess you will speechless when you do the 60 to whatever to pass. For me, being able to execute an immediate, safe, evasive maneuver at speed is a huge value.Currently in our Forester, at 60mph you floor it and give it a few moments to hit 65, change lanes, continue flooring it, and by the time the pass is complete, decelerate from 70 or (75 if going downhill). Meanwhile the cabin sounds like an old Starbucks coffee grinder.
We just road tripped from Chicago to Seattle in the Forester and it was laugh-out-loud at times for how poorly it was at passing. No complaints, just funny.
Cant wait to pass in a LucidTest driving at 70+mph was incredible and responsive.
I agree. I am so tired of folks talking about 0-60. Almost all BEVs do fine at that. What I want to know is how it will do passing on a hill on a country road going 60 mph...how does it do going 60-80?I venture to guess you will speechless when you do the 60 to whatever to pass. For me, being able to execute an immediate, safe, evasive maneuver at speed is a huge value.
The AGT is phenomenal going uphill from 60-80. I'm sure the Touring and Pure will be more than fine as wellI agree. I am so tired of folks talking about 0-60. Almost all BEVs do fine at that. What I want to know is how it will do passing on a hill on a country road going 60 mph...how does it do going 60-80?
60-80, or 60-120, in the DE feels much faster than even the AMG EQS but the same as a Plaid. My experience is that the Lucid just keeps going where most of the other EVs that I have driven start to slow down.I never doubted 0-60. How does it do 60-80 (i.e., passing on a country road)?
Unless you are well shorter than 6' tall, the rear foot space on the DE will not be comfortable for any distance run. The smaller battery pack that will allow a rear foot well in the other trims should be much better.Being honest, I don’t find this comfortable by any means. I am only 6 Ft.
Now, now Lefty...don't be quick to slander. I have no idea what DCFC means...much less how it melts...I'm pretty sure it came from Sam, or perhaps Parachute.
My initial experience was similar, although not nearly as dramatic in variation between the remaining "range" on the cockpit panel and miles driven. At nearly 1800 miles my overall usage is 3.5 miles/kWh, so about as expected. I was told by CS in the first week that the car needs about 2500 miles to achieve more efficient power use. The variables for usage have been discussed above, but the bottom line is that driver habits and preferences are prime determinants of efficiency among AGT owners.AGT 19” wheels, odometer at 1100 miles . Charged to indicated range of 516, then after driving 253 miles, indicated range left was at 80 miles. Looks like for every mile I drive the range drops by 2 miles on average. Nowhere near the 516. . . But is it because the car isn’t broken in yet with 1100 miles on it?
Can only say that on our first shakedown cruise after delivery, was in exactly that same situation- country road, no traffic, car ahead was doing about 60. While driving in Smooth mode, initiated lane change, punched it, and zoomed past the car and back into my lane. Never fully floored the pedal, but when I looked down, we were doing 117. No effort, no delay, and there was a lot more where that came from.I never doubted 0-60. How does it do 60-80 (i.e., passing on a country road)?