xponents
Active Member
Wait I forgot the car also has 2.5x the downforce of a 992 gt3 at 120 mph
Munro's first engineering evaluation of the Air
- Thread starter DeaneG
- Start date
Very ambitious, congrats on that part.
I guess, I'll have to scale back on teasing you (no promises though).
xponents
Active Member
I will shake the truth out of you lol
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
- Messages
- 5,454
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Cars
- Lucid Air Grand Touring
- Referral Code
- F0ZQ8SWA
Somehow I bumped into this video online.
I wanted to hear the rest of this.
What does he say afterwards? Everything else other than the power system Tesla is better?
What does that leave? Software?
Keep in mind, he's mostly looking at this from the manufacturing angle. Tesla does have some really good optimizations around how to build a car efficiently.
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
- Messages
- 5,454
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Cars
- Lucid Air Grand Touring
- Referral Code
- F0ZQ8SWA
Not sure, you are watching as much I watched.
Munro is mostly about manufacturing process and engineering dissect analysis. Tesla and no one has better drivetrain efficiency output than Lucid, but they have other efficiency, streamline supply chain, manufacturing cost optimization, software ware development, autonomous tech, etc.
Munro is not a guy believe in creature comfort like luxury shoppers sector, he even thinks Rivian has too many bell and whistles can be omitted to cut cost and bring sales price down. I wonder what he will think of upcoming Cadillac Escalade IQ.
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
- Messages
- 5,454
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Cars
- Lucid Air Grand Touring
- Referral Code
- F0ZQ8SWA
“Everything else Tesla is clobber some?”
I’m with you, I couldn’t find this whole clip.
Munro was made famous by Tesla fanboys, of course he will add " if Lucid goes out of business ' ....he also has to cater to all those Tesla fanboys!!! He can't deny the fact Lucid beats Tesla in EV technology, but he can push the bankrupcy narrative. Thats why i don't listen to what he says, Very biased towards Tesla.
Check out 11.10, he trashes Rawlinson because Peter said 4680 batteries was just a packaging thing, no real breakthrough- which is true!!
But guess what, the Model Y with the 4680 batteries is less efficient and only has 279 mile range. Rawlinson was right but Munro had to stroke his Tesla ego and attack Rawlinson.
Tesla Explains Why The Refreshed Model Y Only Has A 279 Mile Range Despite 4680 Cells & Structural Pack
Tesla has finally given an explanation on why the refreshed Model Y only has a 279-mile range despite sporting the revolutionary 4680 cells and a structural battery pack.
www.torquenews.com
Munro is smart when he needs to be, but in the end he's running a business. He needs to make it sound like everything is a breakthrough technology so people pay him to do breakdowns. That's all it is to it, a marketing scheme.
If people think he knows more than what's out there, they'll pay him for the info. He just needs to sell the argument.
If people think he knows more than what's out there, they'll pay him for the info. He just needs to sell the argument.
Also doesn't that article state Tesla purposely put in a smaller battery pack?
Check out 11.10, he trashes Rawlinson because Peter said 4680 batteries was just a packaging thing, no real breakthrough- which is true!!
But guess what, the Model Y with the 4680 batteries is less efficient and only has 279 mile range. Rawlinson was right but Munro had to stroke his Tesla ego and attack Rawlinson.
Tesla Explains Why The Refreshed Model Y Only Has A 279 Mile Range Despite 4680 Cells & Structural Pack
Tesla has finally given an explanation on why the refreshed Model Y only has a 279-mile range despite sporting the revolutionary 4680 cells and a structural battery pack.
I haven't seen evidence of the 4680 not being good, but I haven't dug enough
