- Joined
- May 1, 2022
- Messages
- 5,840
- Reaction score
- 8,807
- Location
- San Francisco, CA
- Cars
- Air Touring
- Referral Code
- MX1KDTYY
Lucid is very much focusing on Gravity as well as Air. And Gravity, from a hardware computer standpoint, is a completely different system from Air. They share almost nothing in common, from the chips powering the computers to the screens, to the hardware buttons, and on and on.No way of telling how many of them are focused on software though. Given that Rivian produced 57,232 vehicles compared to Lucid's 8,428, many of those employees might be on the production/service/marketing side of things. Rivian has had to develop for 2 different (although software wise very similar) vehicles (R1T and R1S) while Lucid has only had to focus on 1 vehicle. I can't imagine either company needing more than a couple hundred developers to focus on software (maybe I'm, off on the number).
Writing software for these two cars is sort of like writing software for an iPad and a Mac at the same time. Similar language, but very different user interfaces.
R1-S and R1-T are almost identical, from a computer hardware standpoint, as far as I can tell. So software differences between the two are likely much smaller. R2 and R3 likewise seem to share many of the same computer paradigms, if not the same overall hardware. Software on these cars is likely to very easily carry over from their elder siblings.
This is smart, of course. But could be limiting long-term.
You are right that most employees of both companies are likely not on the software team. But Rivian's team, just by extrapolation from the overall employee figures, has to be more than double Lucid's. Especially when you consider that Lucid has engineered and manufactured more of its hardware parts in house compared to Rivian tending to use more off the shelf bits. That means they likely have a lower percentage of hardware engineers on their team than Lucid. (But I'm guessing about that.)
And don't get me wrong; I think Rivian is doing an amazing job all around. I just think they are taking a different approach from Lucid. One that may be paying off better short term, but we'll have to see down the line where both end up.
Personally, I think both companies have an exceptional chance at being strong players in the long run. They are miles ahead of where most ICE manufacturers are with their EVs, and unlikely to be caught anytime soon by any one of them.