Both of these are assumptions based on the idea that you have all the knowledge. I keep repeating this, but on average, when I find that someone does something I think is dumb, and then doubles down and digs their feet in, *something else is going on* and there is *information I don’t have*.
Sometimes, that missing information changes *everything*. I don’t know if that’s the case here. I do know we do not have the full story, because by this point Lucid would have tried to save face, as we’ve seen before.
So the idea that this is a “company decision” as if somehow some policy has changed is almost certainly not true, because they would have simply stated that. It is simple to state “the policy has changed.”
Because they haven’t, that means this is not the same situation as the few vehicles that never got to 2.1.43, who were either flashed or whose TCUs were replaced for free. This never got close, and the resolution is clearly very different, and so
something else is going on.
Until we have more information, which may never happen, the best we can do is commiserate with
@rking0122 and wait to see if we ever find out the details.
Now, if we hear this happening more than once, you could make an argument it’s a policy change. But a single,
unique, situation is not a trend or pattern.
I’m certain Lucid can flash old TCUs. And new ones. And that by this point, if it were as simple as being out $1400, they would likely have good-willed it to be done with the drama.
So, what’s more likely:
1) Lucid hates
@rking0122 and its customers and has adopted a new policy of intentionally pissing people off, or,
2) There is important information we are not privy to.
If I had to make a bet, it’s the latter. Some people seem to want to bet on the former. Fine.
But, and this is important: none of us know, and all of us are guessing.