Amazon was running into new markets of undetermined but likely vast size and was disrupting at a giant scale. And it was growing revenue like crazy all throughout. Same with many other tech companies (like in AI space right now). Tesla is a bit of a puzzlement - it developed with a lot of hype during a massive asset bubble (that likely is continuing today) but was running into a market that in the USA at least is remarkably static. New car sales is a zero sum game over a 30-40 year period; there's almost no overall market unit growth. Its stock price has never made much sense from a fundamentals standpoint; even now its PE is by far the highest of the Mag 7. Now that its growth story is kind of played out (and hampered by its CEO's slipping grip on reality) the stock is taking a beating, even as they try to reposition it as more than a car company (AI, robots, self-driving, batteries, solar, etc) so that it looks a little bit more like an Amazon. LCID can't even pretend to be anything other than a car company yet.
I think Tesla was a unique story in the car market. I'm afraid that if everyone thinks Lucid can be the next Tesla that that's not a realistic expectation. And Amazon is a completely different ball of wax entirely.
It does help that LCID is a fairly perfect hedge against fossil fuels, but only to an extent - selling the vehicles is very different than selling the fuel. So it's likely to continue to get love from the Saudi PIF for some time to come, but I think it's crazy to suggest that shilling cars is ever going to come remotely close to matching their importance in fossil fuels.
Just an opinion.