This reminds me of a conversation I had with a Design Studio sales person some months before the Air entered production. Lucid had earlier posted a job for Manager of Air Suspension design, and early press reports said the car was going to have an air suspension. ("Car & Driver" continued to refer to its air suspension long after the car was in production.) But then news emerged that the Air was going to have a coil / semi-active damper setup instead. I asked why and was told it was because Lucid was using the same air suspension supplier as Rivian (which had not entered production, either), but Rivian was getting all the attention from the supplier.
As I got to know more about Rawlinson's background at Lotus and Jaguar -- two storied suspension houses -- I began to doubt the story, figuring the man knew his stuff when it came to suspensions and must have been planning the coil setup all along. And now driving a Lucid myself and seeing all the glowing handling reports from professional drivers, I totally got why that would have been the case.
But then I still think about that early job posting . . . . Did we actually end up with the superb ride and handling of the Air (far better than our Tesla's air setup) due to an inattentive supplier?
I do understand your want of the coil suspension, but do we really think that air suspensions HAVE to be bad in all cases? Other than the natural attributes of it, such as hysteresis lag(which could probably be mostly tuned out), I would still trust Peter to be able to engineer the hell out of the air suspension.
Also, if Rawlinson already was a suspension master(which I do not have ANY doubt about), why would it be changed on such short notice? After all, even when he joined Lucid and premiered the Air prototype which had air suspension, he was
still the same guy from Lotus who was good with suspension. If he thought air suspension was fitting for 4.5 years(2016-2020/2021), then why would he suddenly change his mind? Perhaps after driving the car himself?
Air suspensions can also be very good at some other things, like keeping the car flat with other tech coupled(try mercedes magic body control once... its RIDICULOUS) and switching between sporty modes and comfort modes more aggressively than adaptive dampers(eg: it can get stiffer and more comfortable than coil in the same thing). For actual track driving, a coil suspension will be better with no doubt(sapphire..). However, as a grand touring car, which I believe the air excels at, I would much prefer air suspension for the regular trims. For what I mean by grand touring vs sports car, think of a Bentley Continental GT vs a 911 GT3 RS. The Bentley will be good for light spirited driving and FAR more comfortable, but the 911 will beat it any day on the track. This is EXACTLY what the air is.
The fact that it is an SUV also makes more of a case for air suspensions, as "real" offroading suv owners would love the height adjustable air suspension. In addition, not many people will be driving their SUV's in a spirited manner.