msaunders9430
Active Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2024
- Messages
- 233
- Reaction score
- 237
Some slack, yes, but if I get an update saying the oil on my Gravity needs changing, we got a problem.I brought Tesla up because, like it or not, they rake in the accolades from all quarters for their software while Lucid has been crucified for theirs.
Yet, after over nine years of driving Teslas and three years of driving Lucids, I would take the Lucid approach to the total control suite (software and manual controls) over the Tesla approach any day of the week. And, believe me, Tesla's software is not as reliable as many assume.
The point is that Tesla -- which now calls itself a software company (when it's not a robotics company or whatever it's going to be next week) -- has been selling cars since 2008 and still can't get a new model out the door with all planned software features functioning.
And premium German carmakers are still pumping out cars that don't even have at-home OTA update capability, while century-old VW is stuck in a morass of software woes. And don't forget the Audi eTron that hit the market giving drivers software alerts that the car was due for an oil change.
In the space of just over three years years, Lucid has brought two car lines to market that shot straight to the top of the pack in EV technology and space packaging as well as taking a place in the top tier of driving dynamics. If they need a little time to nail down every corner of their software tent, then they deserve to be cut at least as much slack as every other automaker has been cut.
I get your point.