- Joined
- Jan 3, 2022
- Messages
- 4,619
- Reaction score
- 4,839
- Location
- Santa Clara County, CA
- Cars
- Air GT, XC40 P8 EV
- Referral Code
- 3OKY7YGA
I agree Lucid's nav will continue to get better. I checked just now and see that Lucid fixed that specific translation issue from Google maps I reported four months ago. But I don't think the fundamental problem will go away - the need to translate from the maps database that most people use when planning, to a different and much more limited database in the car. I don't want to translate and hope. I want the map I used for planning a trip to be exactly the map I use for navigation, without having to check for quietly introduced errors.Except it has fundamentally improved, and in significant ways. Locations that used to be wrong for me no longer are, in addition to other features that have been added.
The translation issue between Google Maps and Lucid is a real issue, which boils down to the fact that Google has two methods of sending location info. One works, the other doesn’t. That’s why it’s inconsistent. Apple Maps and Waze send it the same way every time, which is why this doesn’t appear as an issue for people using those apps....
As much work as Lucid will put into HERE maps and navigation, having used it and Google maps for years, in my opinion HERE will always trail Google maps, and Apple maps. HERE just doesn't have the user momentum, and the power of crowdsourcing to maintain and expand the database. It'll always be second rate.