The question is whether your 5000 miles on driving duplicated, on average, the driving conditions programmed into the EPA testing cycle. There car be a very wide variance between any two drivers over 5000 miles of driving, and very few will get anywhere close to the driving conditions assumed by EPA testing.
I think people widely misunderstand the real utility of EPA ratings. They have never been good predictors of actual range that drivers will see in real-world conditions, whether with an ICE vehicle or an EV. Their real use is in comparing one vehicle's range to another when each vehicle is driving in identical conditions.
Thus, for example, while neither a Tesla nor a Lucid are likely to realize their EPA ratings in real-world driving, the EPA range does tell you that a Lucid Air will go significantly further on the same amount of electricity than a Tesla Model S (two cars of almost identical size and drag coefficient).
At the end of the day, every range test reported by reputable, independent journalists has shown that a Lucid Air will go significantly further on a full charge than any over EV on the market.
Yes, the Air's battery is a bit bigger than in most sedans . . . but when you're planning how to get to the next charging station, do you really care whether you have a 100- or a 112-kWh battery pack (especially if the 112-kWh pack can charge faster)?