This is exactly the mindset that enables the problem.
“Bigger fish to fry” doesn’t excuse repeatedly missing commitments, it defines the issue. You can’t market features, price them into a $100K+ vehicle, miss every timeline, and then pivot to “well, priorities changed” like that’s acceptable. That’s not strategy, it’s just poor execution.
Defending it with “the EV climate” or “resources” just lowers the bar even further. Every automaker is dealing with the same environment, yet not all of them are overpromising and then quietly moving the goalposts when it’s time to deliver.
Scrutiny isn’t being “hung up on it”, it’s holding a premium brand accountable. If owners just shrug and say “oh well, bigger fish,” then why would the company ever tighten up timelines or communication? There’s zero incentive to improve when missed commitments are constantly excused.
At this price point, you don’t get the benefit of the doubt, you earn trust by delivering. Right now, Lucid has a really bad pattern of overpromise and underdeliver, and pretending that’s fine doesn’t help the company or its customers.