All I know is that the ACC on every car that I have driven, other than Lucid, works correctly.
Maybe you need to take a drive with a service tech? I've never had an issue following any car. If traffic is more congested I use 2 bars.
All I know is that the ACC on every car that I have driven, other than Lucid, works correctly.
No, it's a bug.Maybe you need to take a drive with a service tech? I've never had an issue following any car. If traffic is more congested I use 2 bars.
I can attest to this also. ACC\HA are fine in moving traffic it's when traffic is at a complete stop on the freeway. You just continue to approach at the high speed and as i'm in a car and not of a roller coaster at 6 flags it freaks you out at the speed it's approaching stopped vehicles.No, it's a bug.
It only happens when all traffic is stopped. My guess is that the software gets confused because that are no motion triggers.
In Houston traffic, if I set the distance to two bars, people just fill in the cap and I keep getting pushed back!I can attest to this also. ACC\HA are fine in moving traffic it's when traffic is at a complete stop on the freeway. You just continue to approach at the high speed and as i'm in a car and not of a roller coaster at 6 flags it freaks you out at the speed it's approaching stopped vehicles.
In stop and go traffic, i've found 2 bar distance to be the sweet spot.
In Houston traffic, if I set the distance to two bars, people just fill in the cap and I keep getting pushed back!![]()
![]()
I use ACC and HA on a regular basis and so far its worked as intended. When traffic slows, or a car comes in front of me, the Car slows down as it should, without too much of a sudden change. I have not encountered coming at speed to stopped traffic on the freeway yet so not sure how my car would react. I think I would probably take over if I noticed the car wasn't reacting in time with regards to my feeling of what's a safe distance. I would be interested to see if this is common place where the car doesn't recognized stopped traffic on ACC or HA without a reference car slowing down in front, but I don't want to test out this theory, cause this car is heavy and takes a while to stop without regen braking kicking in instantly.
The manual says:Received my Touring in early April. Love it except for one feature. LUCID, PLEASE DIAL BACK THE SPEED with which ACC APPROACHES STOPPED CARS WHEN AT HIGHWAY SPEED. It scares us to death! In NJ, a car in an adjoining lane approaching a traffic light with stopped traffic could try to quickly cut over to my lane between me and the car I am zooming up behind. ACC should be calibrated to begin slowing further back than it does.
It's not calibrated to stop for stopped cars at all. Read the manual. You need to manually turn off ACC when approaching stationary objects.Received my Touring in early April. Love it except for one feature. LUCID, PLEASE DIAL BACK THE SPEED with which ACC APPROACHES STOPPED CARS WHEN AT HIGHWAY SPEED. It scares us to death! In NJ, a car in an adjoining lane approaching a traffic light with stopped traffic could try to quickly cut over to my lane between me and the car I am zooming up behind. ACC should be calibrated to begin slowing further back than it does.
Thanks for the clarification. Not to be quarrelsome - just my observation: The question is why not? Seems like a flaw to me. My 2013 Lincoln’s ACC slows down for stopped cars. It doesn’t come screaming up their tail pipe.
Thanks for the clarification. Not to be quarrelsome - just my observation: The question is why not? Seems like a flaw to me. My 2013 Lincoln’s ACC slows down for stopped cars. It doesn’t come screaming up their tail pipe.
This is a planned feature Lucid is working on. But it is not a part of the current feature set. Programming takes time.Thanks for the clarification. Not to be quarrelsome - just my observation: The question is why not? Seems like a flaw to me. My 2013 Lincoln’s ACC slows down for stopped cars. It doesn’t come screaming up their tail pipe.
Lucid uses the NVIDIA DRIVE software which supposedly includes all the tools to make this happen. Nvidia really touts the software and makes it seem like it can do all these wonderful things. It sounds like this software is really not for prime time yet, and it requires a lot of input from Lucid — that, or Lucid is dragging their feet and don’t have the software expertise to pull it off.It's a software issue. Someone needs to write up a program to brake for stationary obstacles. Lucid has just got up to brake for moving obstacles only. It takes money and time to do the next step.
Lucid uses the NVIDIA DRIVE software which supposedly includes all the tools to make this happen. Nvidia really touts the software and makes it seem like it can do all these wonderful things. It sounds like this software is really not for prime time yet, and it requires a lot of input from Lucid — that, or Lucid is dragging their feet and don’t have the software expertise to pull it off...
I have said this over and over and been put down for it. Lucid did a poor job of implementing ACC because it works differently than most other cars.Thanks for the clarification. Not to be quarrelsome - just my observation: The question is why not? Seems like a flaw to me. My 2013 Lincoln’s ACC slows down for stopped cars. It doesn’t come screaming up their tail pipe.
I have said this over and over and been put down for it. Lucid did a poor job of implementing ACC because it works differently than most other cars.