Still hating Elon Musk?

[RM-S8]

 

[RM-S8]

Still no comments?
Deep hatered, but why.
I understand. Actually, I don't.

 

[RM-S8]

But...this may explain

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902499980210008303

 

[xponents]

SpaceX is one of the reasons I liked Elon Musk when I was younger (think 2018)… being so interested in space then, I thought what they were doing seemed magical and was rooting for them (still am!). No matter what anybody thinks of Elon, they truly are one of the few companies today advancing American innovation! I didn’t reply earlier because I didn’t see the post, sorry about that, but nevertheless, I fully agree with you.

 

[RM-S8]

SpaceX is one of the reasons I liked Elon Musk when I was younger (think 2018)… being so interested in space then, I thought what they were doing seemed magical and was rooting for them (still am!). No matter what anybody thinks of Elon, they truly are one of the few companies today advancing American innovation! I didn’t reply earlier because I didn’t see the post, sorry about that, but nevertheless, I fully agree with you.

You DO realize that I'm fighting with a huge wave of liberal voices on this site, right?
Regardless Elon Musk, let's think how much more he's willing to bring to the table.
- Neurolink (I guess libs don't like blind people gaining an ability to recognise shspes)
- SpaceX (I guess libs don't like stranded astronauts being rescued)
- Starlink (Ukraine would be totally effed without it. Libs are quiet about it)
- Tesla (up to 6 months ago, libs love this child)
- ...and the last one. (Musk dared to expose libs money waste )
- anything else that I forgot, libs?

 

[RM-S8]

I'm absolutely convinced that if President Trump said is pro oxygen, the liberals would suffocate themselves.
Comments ?

 

[xponents]

You DO realize that I'm fighting with a huge wave of liberal voices on this site, right?

Yes, but that can’t stop me from agreeing with you!

Regardless Elon Musk, let's think how much more he's willing to bring to the table.
- Neurolink (I guess libs don't like blind people gaining an ability to recognise shspes)
- SpaceX (I guess libs don't like stranded astronauts being rescued)
- Starlink (Ukraine would be totally effed without it. Libs are quiet about it)
- Tesla (up to 6 months ago, libs love this child)
- ...and the last one. (Musk dared to expose libs money waste )
- anything else that I forgot, libs?

I especially love Neuralink, as they provide a possible chance to help me!

 

[RM-S8]

Yes, but that can’t stop me from agreeing with you!

I especially love Neuralink, as they provide a possible chance to help me!

I'm not gonna to ask you to elaborate on this, as it's most likely very personal.
Continuing on the subject, don't you ever quit.

 

[xponents]

I'm not gonna to ask you to elaborate on this, as it's most likely very personal.
Continuing on the subject, don't you ever quit.

Oh, nothing too bad, simply a basic condition that doesn't have much of an effect on my life! It's has about the same level of "impact to life" as bad vision, for a reference point. Due to Neuralink theoretically interacting with our brain, it is possible to be fixed, and I am rooting for them.

 

[RM-S8]

Let's not forget Tesla's Optimus.

 

[Bunnylebowski]

Is it fun talking to yourself?

 

[Bunnylebowski]

In case one sentence was not enough, here’s another. You’re on a forum for a car made by a brilliant automotive engineer who has been repeatedly slandered and lied about by your boy Musk.

 

[Bunnylebowski]

And here’s a 3rd sentence.
That’s enough troll food, I could tell you were starving but that’s all you’re getting from me.

 

[RM-S8]

Is it fun talking to yourself?

Actually, I'm talking to the asshole behind you.

 

[borski]

I'm absolutely convinced that if President Trump said is pro oxygen, the liberals would suffocate themselves.
Comments ?

Your questions aren't questions, but are the definition of flamebait [0]. That is why nobody has responded to you. Nobody wants to feed the troll [1]. This is the internet, not the op-ed column for your local HOA.

Nobody has to read or care about your commentary, and I imagine a good portion of people have you blocked at this point, mostly due to threads like this.

I don't care, because apparently we're in the 'anything goes and anyone can be a dick' lounge, so whether I agree this should exist or not, I guess I don't have to be careful either: this post sucks, and there is nothing useful or fun to respond to. That's why nobody has responded to you. There is nothing to respond to, because you are standing in the corner of a room literally begging people to fight with you, like the drunk guy at your favorite bar who is just looking to get knocked out. This is the literal definition of "trolling."

You're picking a fight with a bunch of people that are not trying to fight you. You think you are "fighting with a huge wave of liberal voices on this site," when in reality, you are the only one fighting, and the rest of us (many of whom are not liberal in their politics) are just trying to get along. You don't seem to understand that there is a time and place, and this is neither. Nobody is here because they want to fight about political shit with you.

There you go. That's why this thread is lonely. It has nothing to do with your politics, and everything to do with what you say and how you say it.

Just in case you gave a shit, now you have an answer.

See ya, and have a lovely weekend.

[0] "Flamebait" refers to a provocative or offensive message posted online, designed to elicit an angry or argumentative response, often with the aim of starting a "flame war" or causing disruption. Flamebait can take many forms, including but not limited to: provocative statements about controversial topics like politics, religion, or social issues; offensive or insulting comments directed at specific individuals or groups; using all caps, excessive exclamation points, or profanity to create a sense of urgency or aggression.

[1] An "internet troll" is someone who intentionally tries to instigate conflict, hostility, or arguments in an online social community. Trolls often seek to provoke an emotional response, disrupt discussions, and waste people's time. Examples of trolling behaviors include, but are not limited to: posting personal insults meant to humiliate others; making statements designed to upset others; disrupting forums with off-topic comments; agitating to start fights between friends or strangers.

 

[RM-S8]

Nobody?
I'd say majority of voters disagree with your comments. Am I assuming correctly you've seen latest polls?
But, nice rant .

 

[LucidDropkick]

Oooo! I can play this game.

You DO realize that I'm fighting with a huge wave of liberal voices on this site, right?

Oh pumpkin, you're not "fighting a huge wave of liberal voices". You're just being corrected by people who passed basic civics. But please, continue your persecution fantasy where you're some brave warrior instead of just another keyboard crusader with a victim complex that could fill the Grand Canyon. It's adorable how you conservatives need to invent imaginary enemies to feel important. Next you'll tell us the latte liberals are hiding under your bed waiting to steal your gender. Bless your heart.

Regardless Elon Musk, let's think how much more he's willing to bring to the table.

Oh this should be good! Please enlighten us about the genius billionaire who bought Twitter just to tank its value, promised self-driving cars for a decade, and builds tunnels that are just roads but smaller. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting to hear how the guy who named his kid after an email password is going to save humanity.

- Neurolink (I guess libs don't like blind people gaining an ability to recognise shspes)

It's Neuralink, not "Neurolink" (but since when did conservatives care about annoyances like getting facts right?). Yeah, Neuralink is cool as hell. Basically science fiction. Neuralink also seemingly has fuck-all to do with Elon Musk apart from taking his money and Musk rushing to X faster than a teenager posts TikToks to announce what actual scientists accomplished. He's a majority shareholder and a founder, but he hasn't done anything at all with neuroscience, much less participated in the company. He's not the CEO, he's not working on it, he isn't doing anything with the actual science itself. So yes, congrats, he gave it an assload of money, which of course massively helps when you're pushing the boundaries of science, but that doesn't make him some messiah to go thanking. It makes him a rich guy with a checkbook and an ego the size of Jupiter who thinks standing near smart people somehow transfers their IQ points to him through osmosis.

- SpaceX (I guess libs don't like stranded astronauts being rescued)

Yes, SpaceX, another company founded by Musk, but not run by Musk. Musk has no qualifications in rocket science whatsoever. What you're discounting is the incredible brilliance of Gwynne Shotwell, the COO and President of SpaceX, who is widely regarded as one of the most intelligent engineers on the planet when it comes to space science. But no, daddy Musk gave them billions of dollars so we must all drop to our knees and worship at the altar of Elon. Typical conservative, can't go 10 seconds without completely disregarding the achievements of a woman (and I bet you didn't even stop and think about that for one moment, did you?). Go on, tell me how "woke" I am and how that's all "DEI nonsense," because that's all you people can ever regurgitate when your billionaire man-crush gets challenged.

- Starlink (Ukraine would be totally effed without it. Libs are quiet about it)

We are talking about the same Starlink that somehow went strategically dark in places where it would benefit Putin and hurt Ukraine, right? THAT Starlink? Just want to make sure. I don't think I've ever heard anyone say "man, screw Musk and democratizing internet access via satellite, no one needs that," but I have heard plenty of people argue that Starlink shouldn't be wielded like a political weapon over Ukraine's head whenever Emperor Elon has a temper tantrum. But I forgot, conservatives all love Putin now, he's not such a bad guy. Just a misunderstood strongman you all secretly wish would adopt you. Also, again, Starlink's success comes from two things: Gwynne Shotwell's absolute brilliance, and a metric fuckload of government subsidies...including a billion dollars over the next decade. But that's the thing about you conservatives, always happy with socialism when it lines your pockets, but suddenly it's communist tyranny welfare when it helps poor people eat. How convenient.

- Tesla (up to 6 months ago, libs love this child)

People have been annoyed with Musk for a lot longer than you think, but that would require you to think...a terrifying proposition for the conservative brain. I know this is going to be a lot of words for you, and it's not going to show up on Fox News with scary music telling you how to feel about it, so you're going to have to make your own conclusions from it (something that you "do your own research" types claim to love while exclusively consuming YouTube conspiracy theories): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Tesla,_Inc. Note how many of these issues are from much earlier than 6 months ago (but given that conservatives have the memory of a fucking goldfish, it's not shocking to me that you don't know the difference between 6 months and 6 years). Also, have you stopped to consider that "the libs" are changing their minds? It's a thing that intelligent human beings do, when confronted with new information that flies in the face of what they previously believed, they change their perspective. I know that's a foreign concept when your entire worldview is based on blindly following whatever billionaire daddy figure tells you what to think this week. Don't think too hard about that now, or your brain might freeze like Texas' power grid during a light frost (but thank fuck we privatized the grid, amirite? Tell those dead frozen Texans to pull themselves up by their bootstraps like the rest of the real Americans).

- ...and the last one. (Musk dared to expose libs money waste )

Again, it's not like "the libs" were claiming there isn't any government waste. It's just that "the libs" don't exactly think that USAID is a total waste when it's the only reason that some countries are even still in existence, and that the Department of Education isn't "a waste"... though I understand education programs threaten your entire political ideology. But then again, I suppose when Musk can't understand why there's Social Security benefits going to orphaned children and mistakes 150-year old people who don't exist for actual beneficiaries, and often gets things catastrophically wrong like the difference between 8 million and 8 billion, I suppose there's not much more to really discuss. But please, tell me more about how the world's richest shitposter is qualified to audit government spending between Twitter meltdowns and failed rocket launches. The only thing wasted here is the oxygen you're using to worship him.

- anything else that I forgot, libs?

Yeah, you forgot to mention (although I guess your post mentions it pretty clearly) that like many hardcore conservatives, you live simultaneously as a victim and a victor, permanently oppressed by the big bad government while somehow also winning the culture war.

You believe in hard work but don't think billionaires should have to work for their money, just inherit it or exploit workers better!

You believe in people contributing their fair share but scream "COMMUNISM!" at anything that could remotely resemble public services.

You hate taxes but will be the first to whine when your fire departments start closing down and your roads start crumbling into dust.

You worship wealth like it's a personality trait while defending people who wouldn't let you shine their shoes.

You know what's truly pathetic? Your entire ideology exists solely to trick poor people like you into voting against your own self-interests while billionaires laugh all the way to their tax havens. You're not a "future millionaire". You're a useful idiot with Stockholm syndrome and a MAGA hat.

You know why no one else is bothering with this post? Because you're an irritating little footnote on the wrong side of history. Born on 3rd base thinking you hit a triple. The intellectual equivalent of a puddle after a light rain. So utterly convinced that any counter-argument is "libtard rage" because you possess the political maturity of a parrot that learned to speak by listening exclusively to Joe Rogan's bathroom thoughts.

Elon won't save you. Tucker won't save you. And history won't remember you, except as part of the cautionary tale about how easily democracy dies to thunderous applause from people too busy gargling billionaire bathwater to notice they're drowning.

And now, I'm going to add you to my ignore list, not because I'm too afraid to see what you have to say, but because I quite frankly don't give a flying fuck, and I'm taking a page out of your book; fuck you, I got mine. I don't owe you anything.

Enjoy being miserable

 

[stratus]

Oooo! I can play this game.


Oh pumpkin, you're not "fighting a huge wave of liberal voices". You're just being corrected by people who passed basic civics. But please, continue your persecution fantasy where you're some brave warrior instead of just another keyboard crusader with a victim complex that could fill the Grand Canyon. It's adorable how you conservatives need to invent imaginary enemies to feel important. Next you'll tell us the latte liberals are hiding under your bed waiting to steal your gender. Bless your heart.

View attachment 27429




Oh this should be good! Please enlighten us about the genius billionaire who bought Twitter just to tank its value, promised self-driving cars for a decade, and builds tunnels that are just roads but smaller. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting to hear how the guy who named his kid after an email password is going to save humanity.



It's Neuralink, not "Neurolink" (but since when did conservatives care about annoyances like getting facts right?). Yeah, Neuralink is cool as hell. Basically science fiction. Neuralink also seemingly has fuck-all to do with Elon Musk apart from taking his money and Musk rushing to X faster than a teenager posts TikToks to announce what actual scientists accomplished. He's a majority shareholder and a founder, but he hasn't done anything at all with neuroscience, much less participated in the company. He's not the CEO, he's not working on it, he isn't doing anything with the actual science itself. So yes, congrats, he gave it an assload of money, which of course massively helps when you're pushing the boundaries of science, but that doesn't make him some messiah to go thanking. It makes him a rich guy with a checkbook and an ego the size of Jupiter who thinks standing near smart people somehow transfers their IQ points to him through osmosis.



Yes, SpaceX, another company founded by Musk, but not run by Musk. Musk has no qualifications in rocket science whatsoever. What you're discounting is the incredible brilliance of Gwynne Shotwell, the COO and President of SpaceX, who is widely regarded as one of the most intelligent engineers on the planet when it comes to space science. But no, daddy Musk gave them billions of dollars so we must all drop to our knees and worship at the altar of Elon. Typical conservative, can't go 10 seconds without completely disregarding the achievements of a woman (and I bet you didn't even stop and think about that for one moment, did you?). Go on, tell me how "woke" I am and how that's all "DEI nonsense," because that's all you people can ever regurgitate when your billionaire man-crush gets challenged.



We are talking about the same Starlink that somehow went strategically dark in places where it would benefit Putin and hurt Ukraine, right? THAT Starlink? Just want to make sure. I don't think I've ever heard anyone say "man, screw Musk and democratizing internet access via satellite, no one needs that," but I have heard plenty of people argue that Starlink shouldn't be wielded like a political weapon over Ukraine's head whenever Emperor Elon has a temper tantrum. But I forgot, conservatives all love Putin now, he's not such a bad guy. Just a misunderstood strongman you all secretly wish would adopt you. Also, again, Starlink's success comes from two things: Gwynne Shotwell's absolute brilliance, and a metric fuckload of government subsidies...including a billion dollars over the next decade. But that's the thing about you conservatives, always happy with socialism when it lines your pockets, but suddenly it's communist tyranny welfare when it helps poor people eat. How convenient.



People have been annoyed with Musk for a lot longer than you think, but that would require you to think...a terrifying proposition for the conservative brain. I know this is going to be a lot of words for you, and it's not going to show up on Fox News with scary music telling you how to feel about it, so you're going to have to make your own conclusions from it (something that you "do your own research" types claim to love while exclusively consuming YouTube conspiracy theories): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Tesla,_Inc. Note how many of these issues are from much earlier than 6 months ago (but given that conservatives have the memory of a fucking goldfish, it's not shocking to me that you don't know the difference between 6 months and 6 years). Also, have you stopped to consider that "the libs" are changing their minds? It's a thing that intelligent human beings do, when confronted with new information that flies in the face of what they previously believed, they change their perspective. I know that's a foreign concept when your entire worldview is based on blindly following whatever billionaire daddy figure tells you what to think this week. Don't think too hard about that now, or your brain might freeze like Texas' power grid during a light frost (but thank fuck we privatized the grid, amirite? Tell those dead frozen Texans to pull themselves up by their bootstraps like the rest of the real Americans).



Again, it's not like "the libs" were claiming there isn't any government waste. It's just that "the libs" don't exactly think that USAID is a total waste when it's the only reason that some countries are even still in existence, and that the Department of Education isn't "a waste"... though I understand education programs threaten your entire political ideology. But then again, I suppose when Musk can't understand why there's Social Security benefits going to orphaned children and mistakes 150-year old people who don't exist for actual beneficiaries, and often gets things catastrophically wrong like the difference between 8 million and 8 billion, I suppose there's not much more to really discuss. But please, tell me more about how the world's richest shitposter is qualified to audit government spending between Twitter meltdowns and failed rocket launches. The only thing wasted here is the oxygen you're using to worship him.



Yeah, you forgot to mention (although I guess your post mentions it pretty clearly) that like many hardcore conservatives, you live simultaneously as a victim and a victor, permanently oppressed by the big bad government while somehow also winning the culture war.

You believe in hard work but don't think billionaires should have to work for their money, just inherit it or exploit workers better!

You believe in people contributing their fair share but scream "COMMUNISM!" at anything that could remotely resemble public services.

You hate taxes but will be the first to whine when your fire departments start closing down and your roads start crumbling into dust.

You worship wealth like it's a personality trait while defending people who wouldn't let you shine their shoes.

You know what's truly pathetic? Your entire ideology exists solely to trick poor people like you into voting against your own self-interests while billionaires laugh all the way to their tax havens. You're not a "future millionaire". You're a useful idiot with Stockholm syndrome and a MAGA hat.

You know why no one else is bothering with this post? Because you're an irritating little footnote on the wrong side of history. Born on 3rd base thinking you hit a triple. The intellectual equivalent of a puddle after a light rain. So utterly convinced that any counter-argument is "libtard rage" because you possess the political maturity of a parrot that learned to speak by listening exclusively to Joe Rogan's bathroom thoughts.

Elon won't save you. Tucker won't save you. And history won't remember you, except as part of the cautionary tale about how easily democracy dies to thunderous applause from people too busy gargling billionaire bathwater to notice they're drowning.

And now, I'm going to add you to my ignore list, not because I'm too afraid to see what you have to say, but because I quite frankly don't give a flying fuck, and I'm taking a page out of your book; fuck you, I got mine. I don't owe you anything.

Enjoy being miserable

Have mercy!!! This is better than the opinion section of the New York Times! Damn.

 

[RM-S8]

In case one sentence was not enough, here’s another. You’re on a forum for a car made by a brilliant automotive engineer who has been repeatedly slandered and lied about by your boy Musk.

You DO realize that I've got/purchaced 3 Lucids, right?
So, your argument "your boy Musk" holds no water.
"My boy Musk" did a lot for lots of us. Read my OP.
What did your boy (whoever he is) do?

 

[Bunnylebowski]

Oooo! I can play this game.


Oh pumpkin, you're not "fighting a huge wave of liberal voices". You're just being corrected by people who passed basic civics. But please, continue your persecution fantasy where you're some brave warrior instead of just another keyboard crusader with a victim complex that could fill the Grand Canyon. It's adorable how you conservatives need to invent imaginary enemies to feel important. Next you'll tell us the latte liberals are hiding under your bed waiting to steal your gender. Bless your heart.

View attachment 27429




Oh this should be good! Please enlighten us about the genius billionaire who bought Twitter just to tank its value, promised self-driving cars for a decade, and builds tunnels that are just roads but smaller. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting to hear how the guy who named his kid after an email password is going to save humanity.



It's Neuralink, not "Neurolink" (but since when did conservatives care about annoyances like getting facts right?). Yeah, Neuralink is cool as hell. Basically science fiction. Neuralink also seemingly has fuck-all to do with Elon Musk apart from taking his money and Musk rushing to X faster than a teenager posts TikToks to announce what actual scientists accomplished. He's a majority shareholder and a founder, but he hasn't done anything at all with neuroscience, much less participated in the company. He's not the CEO, he's not working on it, he isn't doing anything with the actual science itself. So yes, congrats, he gave it an assload of money, which of course massively helps when you're pushing the boundaries of science, but that doesn't make him some messiah to go thanking. It makes him a rich guy with a checkbook and an ego the size of Jupiter who thinks standing near smart people somehow transfers their IQ points to him through osmosis.



Yes, SpaceX, another company founded by Musk, but not run by Musk. Musk has no qualifications in rocket science whatsoever. What you're discounting is the incredible brilliance of Gwynne Shotwell, the COO and President of SpaceX, who is widely regarded as one of the most intelligent engineers on the planet when it comes to space science. But no, daddy Musk gave them billions of dollars so we must all drop to our knees and worship at the altar of Elon. Typical conservative, can't go 10 seconds without completely disregarding the achievements of a woman (and I bet you didn't even stop and think about that for one moment, did you?). Go on, tell me how "woke" I am and how that's all "DEI nonsense," because that's all you people can ever regurgitate when your billionaire man-crush gets challenged.



We are talking about the same Starlink that somehow went strategically dark in places where it would benefit Putin and hurt Ukraine, right? THAT Starlink? Just want to make sure. I don't think I've ever heard anyone say "man, screw Musk and democratizing internet access via satellite, no one needs that," but I have heard plenty of people argue that Starlink shouldn't be wielded like a political weapon over Ukraine's head whenever Emperor Elon has a temper tantrum. But I forgot, conservatives all love Putin now, he's not such a bad guy. Just a misunderstood strongman you all secretly wish would adopt you. Also, again, Starlink's success comes from two things: Gwynne Shotwell's absolute brilliance, and a metric fuckload of government subsidies...including a billion dollars over the next decade. But that's the thing about you conservatives, always happy with socialism when it lines your pockets, but suddenly it's communist tyranny welfare when it helps poor people eat. How convenient.



People have been annoyed with Musk for a lot longer than you think, but that would require you to think...a terrifying proposition for the conservative brain. I know this is going to be a lot of words for you, and it's not going to show up on Fox News with scary music telling you how to feel about it, so you're going to have to make your own conclusions from it (something that you "do your own research" types claim to love while exclusively consuming YouTube conspiracy theories): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Tesla,_Inc. Note how many of these issues are from much earlier than 6 months ago (but given that conservatives have the memory of a fucking goldfish, it's not shocking to me that you don't know the difference between 6 months and 6 years). Also, have you stopped to consider that "the libs" are changing their minds? It's a thing that intelligent human beings do, when confronted with new information that flies in the face of what they previously believed, they change their perspective. I know that's a foreign concept when your entire worldview is based on blindly following whatever billionaire daddy figure tells you what to think this week. Don't think too hard about that now, or your brain might freeze like Texas' power grid during a light frost (but thank fuck we privatized the grid, amirite? Tell those dead frozen Texans to pull themselves up by their bootstraps like the rest of the real Americans).



Again, it's not like "the libs" were claiming there isn't any government waste. It's just that "the libs" don't exactly think that USAID is a total waste when it's the only reason that some countries are even still in existence, and that the Department of Education isn't "a waste"... though I understand education programs threaten your entire political ideology. But then again, I suppose when Musk can't understand why there's Social Security benefits going to orphaned children and mistakes 150-year old people who don't exist for actual beneficiaries, and often gets things catastrophically wrong like the difference between 8 million and 8 billion, I suppose there's not much more to really discuss. But please, tell me more about how the world's richest shitposter is qualified to audit government spending between Twitter meltdowns and failed rocket launches. The only thing wasted here is the oxygen you're using to worship him.



Yeah, you forgot to mention (although I guess your post mentions it pretty clearly) that like many hardcore conservatives, you live simultaneously as a victim and a victor, permanently oppressed by the big bad government while somehow also winning the culture war.

You believe in hard work but don't think billionaires should have to work for their money, just inherit it or exploit workers better!

You believe in people contributing their fair share but scream "COMMUNISM!" at anything that could remotely resemble public services.

You hate taxes but will be the first to whine when your fire departments start closing down and your roads start crumbling into dust.

You worship wealth like it's a personality trait while defending people who wouldn't let you shine their shoes.

You know what's truly pathetic? Your entire ideology exists solely to trick poor people like you into voting against your own self-interests while billionaires laugh all the way to their tax havens. You're not a "future millionaire". You're a useful idiot with Stockholm syndrome and a MAGA hat.

You know why no one else is bothering with this post? Because you're an irritating little footnote on the wrong side of history. Born on 3rd base thinking you hit a triple. The intellectual equivalent of a puddle after a light rain. So utterly convinced that any counter-argument is "libtard rage" because you possess the political maturity of a parrot that learned to speak by listening exclusively to Joe Rogan's bathroom thoughts.

Elon won't save you. Tucker won't save you. And history won't remember you, except as part of the cautionary tale about how easily democracy dies to thunderous applause from people too busy gargling billionaire bathwater to notice they're drowning.

And now, I'm going to add you to my ignore list, not because I'm too afraid to see what you have to say, but because I quite frankly don't give a flying fuck, and I'm taking a page out of your book; fuck you, I got mine. I don't owe you anything.

Enjoy being miserable

Haha you brought a .50 caliber to this knife fight. I salute you.