Lucid Air Features and Configuration Questions

Based on your observations, a few of my own:

* This inability to unlock the glovebox from the glovebox is just nuts. This is so reminiscent of a Tesla mindset, it's scary.

* I find it disconcerting that the original design's ground clearance was less than the height of a cellphone. That's got to be an issue in some general use cases.. it just has to be. So if the changes, even though resulting in a loss of air suspension, results in a somewhat higher ground clearance, that's a good thing IMO. Of course I still think the car should have a proper air suspension at this tier.

* The thick roof rails and resultant issues opening & closing doors is a real concern. I don't know what the rationale for having such thick roof rails was, but it sure looks as if some design aspects were not thought through as thoroughly as they should have been.

I still haven't seen a Lucid in person and I'm still waiting for a N.Y. showroom to open either in the city or on Long Island so I can formulate my own opinions.

We're off to a rather rocky start in my book. :(
 
I find it disconcerting that the original design's ground clearance was less than the height of a cellphone.

If the showroom prototypes, in fact, have the air suspension, it might have been programmed to lower the car when parked in order to ease entry and exit and raise the car once underway.

Of course I still think the car should have a proper air suspension at this tier.

In asking the question I was hoping to hear something about tradeoffs between air and coil spring suspensions and that the decision to use coil springs had to do with favoring one set of tradeoffs over another for ride and/or handling reasons. To hear that it was dropped because they couldn't get them from a supplier set me back a bit on my heels.

The Porsche Taycan is being produced with air suspensions. The EQS is coming to market with an air suspension. Rivian is using air suspensions on its pickup (which starts shipping next month) and SUV. Air suspensions are all over the place in everything from airplanes to long-haul semis to luxury sedans to sports cars. For Lucid to forgo something as important as the air suspension they planned to use because they can't find a vendor boggles my mind.

The thick roof rails and resultant issues opening & closing doors is a real concern. I don't know what the rationale for having such thick roof rails was, but it sure looks as if some design aspects were not thought through as thoroughly as they should have been.

Given the frustration Rawlinson has expressed over the lack of torsional rigidity with which he had to contend on the Model S and the fact that several Lucid engineers and journalists have commented on the vault-like solidity of the Lucid body, these roof rails probably play a vital role in that rigidity. While they are quite visually intrusive, the effect is somewhat relieved by the glass canopy. I could find them easier to tolerate if the doors could be closed without having to duck under them.
 
So if the Air was initially to be equipped with air suspension, do you accept its absence is due to supplier issues…especially when other manufacturers seemingly have no issues? For me it strains the credibility.
 
I don't know what to make of it. I looked closely at the cut-away chassis in the showroom. Although it had conventional sway bars, it did not have coil springs or anywhere apparent to mount them. What looked like shock towers had what might have been reservoir tanks on them for an air spring setup. I asked the floor manager, and he had no idea. And we know from internet job postings that at one point Lucid was advertising for a Senior Engineer for Air Suspension with a list of job duties that clearly indicated an intent to put an air suspension in the car. As late as the reveal last September, "Car & Driver" and "Motor Trend" were reporting that the car would have an air suspension, presumably being given that information by the Lucid people in attendance at the reveal.

When I called Lucid Sales a couple of weeks ago and got confirmation that the air suspension was gone, they were unable to give me a reason. In the absence of any other explanation coming from Lucid about the abandonment of an air suspension, what I was told at the Design Studio yesterday is all we have to go on.

If the issue really is lack of a supplier, that would suggest that Porsche, Mercedes, Audi, and Rivian are all doing their air suspensions completely in-house . . . . How likely that is I just don't know, but I tend to doubt it.
 
Last edited:
Of course Lucid is not alone in this problem of getting straightforward answers for simple questions, but it's very frustrating nonetheless. It just leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
 
What I'm really curious about is the ride-alongs that have been done with journalists. Both Nikki Gordon-Bloomfield of "Transport Evolved" and Kyle Conner of "InsideEVs" commented on how compliant the ride was, and Gordon-Bloomfield, who was put through more dynamic maneuvers, reported very taut handling in the twisties. However, both those ride-alongs were in beta version cars, not the gamma versions currently undergoing testing.

The transition to coil springs was apparently made sometime after the September reveal, based on "Car & Driver" and "Motor Trend" reporting of that event. So, did those ride-along beta cars have the air suspension or the coil spring suspension?

I emailed "Transport Evolved" with this question a week ago but have gotten no response.

P.S. I just emailed Kyle Conner from "InsideEVs" the same question. I'll report if I hear back anything.
 
Last edited:
Okay . . . latest update from Lucid Sales:

The Airs in which both "Transport Evolved" and "InsideEVs" did the ride-alongs had the coil spring suspension. Lucid has some proprietary development with the coil spring suspension that bears on its performance, and details about that are going to be released soon.

Also, the release build cars that will be provided to customers and the press for test drives are being built this month, with test driving to commence shortly thereafter.
 
Also, the release build cars that will be provided to customers and the press for test drives are being built this month, with test driving to commence shortly thereafter.
This is great news if it happens that soon. The latest information has me a bit worried and the best way to tell is to see it for ourselves and give the journalists access to drive one. I flew over the factory last weekend and there were only 4-5 cars in the parking lot. Previous weekends there were 15-20 cars there. The good news is that the ground is being prepared for the factory expansion.
 
I flew over the factory last weekend and there were only 4-5 cars in the parking lot.

It seems that the cars being built in Casa Grande are being sent to HQ in California where all the non-manufacturing personnel are based. None of the ride-alongs have been done in Arizona, and the video showing Lucid engineers doing evaluations of release candidate cars was filmed at HQ.
 
it seems that, unlike the cars in Miami and West Palm Beach, the Lucid Air in the newly-opened New York Design Studio has the final interior or very close to it.

Here is the front seat in the Miami car:

Screen Shot 2021-07-05 at 10.28.29 AM.png


Here is the front seat of the New York car with the adjustable thigh support:

Screen Shot 2021-07-05 at 10.00.52 AM.png


Here is the rear fold-down armrest that was missing from the Florida cars;

Screen Shot 2021-07-05 at 10.01.54 AM.png


And here is the power-operated sunscreen in the rear doors:
Screen Shot 2021-07-05 at 10.07.19 AM.png


I know the lack of four-sided framing in the front glass canopy makes such a shade unfeasible there, but I wish Lucid had put a retractable sunscreen over at least the rear glass canopy. (A friend's new VW ID.4 has such a feature, and it makes a real difference here in south Florida.) I noticed that Derek Jenkins was wearing a baseball cap in the demo drive he did at the Amelia Island Concours in Florida a couple of months ago. I have not seen him wear such a cap anywhere else, and it leaves me worried about the canopy in our local climate.
 
I just found a reservation tracker on another forum where 23 people have reported the model and color choices they made in placing their Air reservations. There are only 23 responses. Remembering that some choices were constrained because not all exterior and interior colors are available across the models, here are the results:

Models:

6 Dream Edition
10 Grand Touring
2 Touring
5 Air Pure

Exterior Colors:

6 Zenith Red (1 person specified it for a Dream Edition, where it is not as yet available)
6 Quantum Grey
4 Eureka Gold
3 Infinite Black
2 Cosmos Silver
1 Stellar White
1 TBD

Interior Colors:

7 Santa Monica (1 person specified it for a Grand Touring, where it is not as yet available)
7 Mojave
6 Santa Cruz
2 Tahoe
1 TBD

Jonny Lieberman of "Motor Trend" said the Air looked "fantastic" in Zenith Red, and Tom Moloughney of "InsideEVs" said it was "absolutely gorgeous" and predicted it would be the most-chosen color. He may not be far off the mark.

I have thought the car looks really bland in white, and these numbers would suggest others agree.
 
Tom Moloughney of "InsideEVs" posted this photo on his twitter feed yesterday. Those wheels look stupendous. I'm wondering if they'll be offered by production time.

Screen Shot 2021-09-28 at 9.04.14 AM.png
 
I agree. I always thought the wheels on the Grand Touring Trim looked better than the wheels on the Dream Edition. These wheels are a big improvement and fit the car perfectly
 
The 21" Dream wheels are the only ones identified as forged on the Lucid website. Given the low-profile tires, that added rim strength will be useful (not to mention the likely lower weight). Otherwise I would consider buying an extra set of the GT 21" wheels to replace the Dream wheels. Likewise for the wheels above. I would want them if they are forged. If not, I'd stick with the current Dream wheels.

I found that the source of Tom Moloughney's photo was Lucid Motors' twitter account. I'm wondering why Lucid would post such a photo at the opening of Production Preview week if the wheels aren't actually going to be available?

I've emailed Lucid with an inquiry but haven't heard anything back so far. Probably a busy day for them.
 
I called Lucid Sales to ask about the wheels in the above photo and to see if they would become available. I pointed out that this car was previewed to the press during "Production Preview" week and that I would find it odd to present show wheels that would not be available, as the currently available wheels are on hand and could just as easily have been put on this car.

The sales rep spent a couple of minutes telling me he couldn't access the Lucid Motors twitter feed. When he finally did, he tried to tell me this car had the 20" Aerolite wheels that are already on the order configurator. I tried to explain the difference in the two wheels to him, but he was having none of it.

Here is the 20" Aerolite wheel that is depicted on the Lucid order configurator:

Screen Shot 2021-09-28 at 2.41.34 PM.png


And here is the wheel on the Lucid twitter feed from yesterday:
Screen Shot 2021-09-28 at 2.42.07 PM.png


Now, honestly, is it that hard to tell the difference?
 
It's quite obvious. There are 5 black triangular cutouts in the Aerolite wheel that are not on the twitter feed wheel. If I was on the phone I'd be pretty pissed the sales rep was denying reality. It seems to me that the Lucid hierarchy appears to be quite disorganized. The management team and engineering team doesn't keep the sales reps in the loop, and the sales reps are not overly helpful or knowledgeable in disseminating the correct information. This makes me somewhat apprehensive. Will we have the same problem when it comes time to service our cars. Will they also deny there is a problem when something goes wrong.
 
Deliveries begin next month. 13,000 reservations. Yay.
 
It seems to me that the Lucid hierarchy appears to be quite disorganized.

The level of information seems to vary depending on who you ask. Last week in the Miami studio I was told candidly that they are not given any information that is not given to the general public. However, on an earlier visit I encountered someone who said he had some personal contacts elsewhere in the organization. He gave me two pieces of information that were still under wraps but asked me not to publish them. One of those things has since been verified by a public announcement, and the other is still pending.

I'm not so sure it's a matter of disorganization. I think it's more likely a deliberate decision by Lucid to not risk leaks about matters that have not yet reached final resolution internally -- and there have been quite a few of them.
 
It's quite obvious. There are 5 black triangular cutouts in the Aerolite wheel that are not on the twitter feed wheel. If I was on the phone I'd be pretty pissed the sales rep was denying reality. It seems to me that the Lucid hierarchy appears to be quite disorganized. The management team and engineering team doesn't keep the sales reps in the loop, and the sales reps are not overly helpful or knowledgeable in disseminating the correct information. This makes me somewhat apprehensive. Will we have the same problem when it comes time to service our cars. Will they also deny there is a problem when something goes wrong.
It's a valid concern and I certainly hope that will not be the case. I'm hopeful it will more closely follow the service pattern that existed in the early days of Tesla, superb. We shall see.
 
Deliveries begin next month. 13,000 reservations. Yay.
Do you have a link to that? When I last spoke to a Lucid salesperson, they told me deliveries would begin and information would begin to flow once the crash test results were in. Has that happened?

I'd like to finally see a roadmap to when the other Lucid iterations will begin deliveries.
 
Back
Top