Correct, not under warranty and about 3k.I'm guessing Lucid doesn't consider the windshield replacement to be a warranty repair, and is going to charge you for it? If so, I'd be fascinated to know what the bill for that is.
Correct, not under warranty and about 3k.I'm guessing Lucid doesn't consider the windshield replacement to be a warranty repair, and is going to charge you for it? If so, I'd be fascinated to know what the bill for that is.
msaunders9430 said it best - there’s so much speculation about this amazing Gravity GT. Although I surely sympathize with fellow owners experiencing problems, four weeks into ownership, this car has been phenomenal, fit and finish nearly flawless, none of the terrible software issues I read about, thank Goodness. One squeaky rear seat track fixed, key fob problems solved with new battery. FAR better than 10-year old design of Tesla X I traded up for this car, let alone the Model Y I traded for that one. Let’s not try and list the issues with my beloved Signature S. Only my 90D Model S worked as well, and the Gravity is way more functional, user interface is the best I’ve ever seen, ride and handling unbelievable! I don’t think I’m alone with this stellar review.
Yes, it is common sense.It’s really just common sense. If cars are finished at KAEC, they must undergo QC there. From what I understand, Lucid checks US built cars in Casa Grande during production phase, then does another round of quality screening at the regional hub before the car goes to the local service.
That’s why I said QC steps may look different, SKD assembly naturally adds extra checkpoints compared to a single, integrated build at AMP‑1. We all hope defect information is being shared between the facilities. However, Lucid doesn’t publicly publish those internal QC procedures, so you can’t claim them as fact, only as very reasonable assumptions based on manufacturing norms.
For example, German cars feel different depending on whether they’re assembled in the US or Germany, most high end models are assembled in Germany first, then delivered to the US, precisely to protect consistency. Same logic here, build path dictates QC path. It’s like hiring two different contractors for the same job on your house. The work gets done, but the quality can vary.![]()
I see your point, but until Lucid shares hard data comparing US and KSA builds, we are all piecing things together from what owners report. Still, when the same defects keep showing up across multiple cars and reviews, it feels less like speculation and more like a recurring pattern.Yes I do.
Gravities were going to the KSA market before the US market.
My point: Info from KSA deliveries are being shared with US. Some of the examples you provide may or may not be limited to the US market. Unless data shows difference in quality of cars in the two markets, the assertion of diffences is speculation.
Speculation fills in until data are available.
Fun to speculate and assertions made can be funny. Maybe not to you, but to me.
Correct, not under warranty and about 3k.
Speculations and assumptions here ... fun/funny.I see your point, but until Lucid shares hard data comparing US and KSA builds, we are all piecing things together from what owners report. Still, when the same defects keep showing up across multiple cars and reviews, it feels less like speculation and more like a recurring pattern.
Another annoyance that carried over from the Air is the terrible call quality from the car. That’s been flagged before, yet it’s still here in the Gravity. I am sure a lot of people here experience this issue. The mobile and service center replaced my speakers a few times, but that didn’t resolve the issue.
And yes, KSA deliveries started earlier, so ideally that feedback should be flowing back to US. The concern is that even with that loop, issues like seat squeaks, track grinding, call quality are still appearing in new deliveries. For owners, that’s frustrating rather than funny.
Speculation can fill gaps, but repeated defects are evidence. The real question is why those issues are still happening.
Short cut on his own.I'm curious. Did the tint installer tell you he was going to remove the visors or did he undertake that shortcut on his own?
Short cut on his own.
Since I understand Lucid folks look at this site, I am posting this here, duplicating an issue discussed in the Lucid Gravity - Got Boost? Facebook forum:Seeing loads of software issues with the Gravity so far! Most of them are just an inconvenience and part of the early ownership experience but wanted to create a thread for issues
Here's some facts. This car should be much better at this price point and at this point in it's development and delivery cycle. Tesla and Rivian never needed to advertise because the products spoke for themselves.Yes, it is common sense.
I get what you're saying and don't disagree.
However, if those two contractors work for the same company and differences in their work is recognized by customers, I don't see that company allowing those differences to continue.
The lack of publication of internal QC procedures doesn't allow anyone to claim them as facts, but as you said, it does allow for very reasonable assumptions.
Assumptions/speculations.
That's what we do here in the absence of facts.
Agree, at this price point and stage, the car really should be better. That’s why the recurring issues stand out so much. Yes, Tesla and Rivian didn’t need ads early on because their cars spoke for themselves. Lucid could be in that same position, but only if the QC and fixes actually keep up with what people expect, and if SAs aren’t misrepresenting the car’s features.Here's some facts. This car should be much better at this price point and at this point in it's development and delivery cycle. Tesla and Rivian never needed to advertise because the products spoke for themselves.
When you're talking about KSA, this sounds much more threatening and literal.When the Saudi's realize the true state of the software more heads will roll.
the only heads I’d like to see rolling are the ones of engineers rolling their chairs over to fix these bugs fasterWhen you're talking about KSA, this sounds much more threatening and literal.
In my younger years, when I was tinkering with cars, I'd have put on a whole more sound insulation. Don't know if there's any space constraint or just frugality here.Our June-delivery Gravity was missing foam sound insulation pads that were meant to prevent noise from the door sunshades (something we had not actually heard, although we seldom use the shades). Our September-delivery Gravity was not subject to this recall.
Hahaha, I thought exactly the same but I didn't dare to say it for my own safety. Or, as the president said, "things happen"When you're talking about KSA, this sounds much more threatening and literal.
as long as you're not the guy who ruined Netflix dialog, please continue.
Hahaha I know. I never got to work for Christopher Nolan but know someone who was there for the mix of Interstellar and Tenant and the dialog mixer was NOT happy. They were repeatedly directed by Nolan that he wanted the audience to lean forward to hear the dialog and instead feature the music because he wanted it to be more operatic than narrative. Ok fine, the dialog still sounds bad because of him forcing that choice on the team.Or Tenet. oof![]()
In my younger years, when I was tinkering with cars, I'd have put on a whole more sound insulation. Don't know if there's any space constraint or just frugality here.