- Joined
- Dec 18, 2021
- Messages
- 190
- Reaction score
- 186
- Cars
- DB9 Lucid GT
Thanks muchYou should be good. That's the standard setup for an at home EV charger. 240V and 50amps.
Thanks muchYou should be good. That's the standard setup for an at home EV charger. 240V and 50amps.
Thanks much
Much better experiences on EVGo and ChargePoint but unfortunately most of their chargers are limited to 50Kw
EA is almost all DC fast charging (level 3).Lucid will be my first EV.. hence this question. Are these two networks (EVGo and Chargepoint) in general better than EA? If I'm going on a road trip, I don't mind paying for the charging (forget the free EA charging), but are the EVGo and Chargepoint chargers in general more reliable than EA?
what kind of plug Lucid takes? is it CCS/SAE or J-1772?I use Chargepoint Level 3 and EA Level 3 chargers on most of my road trips. I've had very good luck with both, even though I know EA has had many problems in other areas.
The biggest drawback of ChargePoint level 3 chargers are they typically are limited to 62.5kW. So you are looking at roughly an hour to fill a Lucid Air by 50%. Most of the time I use Chargepoint, I'm in remote areas of Colorado where they are plentiful and I only need to top off my EV and add maybe 20%.
The best option for any charging network is to check out the locations you want to use on the PlugShare app. The have a rating based on successful charging sessions. You can also view comments from people who have charged their recently. It will help give you a sense if a certain location is reliable or not.
J1772 for level 2 chargingwhat kind of plug Lucid takes? is it CCS/SAE or J-1772?
In Europe his program has begun, but I’m not aware of any movement here in the U.S.I’ve only used a third party charger twice since the early days of owning my first model S. What is the status of Tesla opening up their chargers to non Teslas? Elon tweeted this was to happen soon ( I know I know insert Elon timeline joke here) however he usually does follow through eventually. Plus he has a big incentive with a chunk of government grants. The Tesla supercharger network is one of their biggest selling points as they are ubiquitous and reliable
If you need to have wires run, IMHO it's worth getting 90A or 100A rated wiring to support the highest charge rate possible with the wall-mounted Lucid home charging station. Even if you don't need it now, you'll save the headache of re-fishing wire down the road. Whether with Lucid or your next EV after that.Thanks much
In Europe his program has begun, but I’m not aware of any movement here in the U.S.
I think the opposite. While the Tesla Supercharger network is a great advantage for Tesla now, it likely will not remain that way. More new investment will support CCS rather than Tesla and many government grants will require it. While still many years away, what is now a strength for Tesla could become a liability. I also suspect that Elon wants to divest the supercharger network at some point. It was a required infrastructure play at the beginning but that is changing. The Supercharger network is a lot more valuable supporting CCS and Tesla. It is infrastructure and not new technology where Elon likes to focus.I doubt they will ever open in the US. They're already overcrowded and Tesla owners will just get annoyed when a Chevy Bolt pulls in taking up a charger for an hour because it's so slow to charge. I also don't see Tesla installing new / additional CCS cables as it's of no value for them and any adapters are probably going to be limited to 50Kw due to heat \ safety issues. The way the Tesla chargers are designed are also going to limit what cars can use them because the cables are quite short and every car maker has decided to stick its charging port all over the place.
It's easier outside of the US because all Teslas are fitted with CCS.
Already implemented CCS2 on refresh X models/I think the opposite. While the Tesla Supercharger network is a great advantage for Tesla now, it likely will not remain that way. More new investment will support CCS rather than Tesla and many government grants will require it. While still many years away, what is now a strength for Tesla could become a liability. I also suspect that Elon wants to divest the supercharger network at some point. It was a required infrastructure play at the beginning but that is changing. The Supercharger network is a lot more valuable supporting CCS and Tesla. It is infrastructure and not new technology where Elon likes to focus.
There are also hints that Tesla may move to CCS in the future even in the US. There are a lot of advantages to a single standard along even setting aside the risk of government mandates. Elon has even advocated for a single standard.
All that said, opening up the Tesla network to CCS may not happen quickly.
Already implemented CCS2 on refresh X models/
View attachment 514
Tesla unveils new CCS2 charge port in refresh Model S/X [Update]
Tesla has unveiled today an updated charge port design for the Model S and Model X in international markets featuring a CCS2 charge port. Until now the Model S/X in Europe and other markets have […]driveteslacanada.ca
They know their standard is proprietary. Until there is regulatory reason (such as in EU), they won't use the standard here.Tesla has had CCS2 on Model 3/Y in Europe for a while. CCS2 is the European standard.
We still have yet to see Tesla implement a CCS (North American standard) on any of their vehicles. Whether they like it or not CCS won out in North America. It's the Betamax versus VHS debate. The longer Tesla holds out with their own plug in North America, the worse it becomes for all of their legacy vehicles. Eventually CCS stations will far surpass Tesla stations, and Tesla owners will always need to purchase and bring an adapter. There are also potentially power limitations with the adapters as they create another joint in the electrical connection.
I believe it is partly around billing.
Tesla has the luxury of allowing you to plug in and charge and bill directly from the car later if there is a network issue getting the superchargers to fully authorize.
EA does not have that luxury.
I still think that Tesla should be required to share the Supercharger network (at reasonable rates, using industry standards) like they are having to do in the EU.
Its infrastructure at this point. I think they can charge fair rates, but either existing ones should be required to meet standards OR they should only be permitted to build future ones that match the country-wide standards.I admire what Tesla and Musk have accomplished but not the way he got there and the arrogance of both the man and the company. Having said that, Tesla invested a huge sum in its supercharger network and I don't think it is fair to REQUIRE Tesla to share it.
Well, they did get a loan from the Department of Energy to build it out. Also, they aren't being required to share it. But, Tesla is a business. They want those billions for charging infrastructure that are being discussed. Recently, BP announced that EV charging will soon be more profitable than gas sales. These companies aren't stupid, there is A LOT of money to be made through charging networks.I admire what Tesla and Musk have accomplished but not the way he got there and the arrogance of both the man and the company. Having said that, Tesla invested a huge sum in its supercharger network and I don't think it is fair to REQUIRE Tesla to share it.
Recently, BP announced that EV charging will soon be more profitable than gas sales.