Have you ever built Android Auto into a vehicle? I can pretty much guarantee they’re not just sitting on it going “meh, we’ll get to it eventually, it’s not a big deal and nobody cares.”After spending the week enjoying Android Auto in a Jeep rental car that costs about a third of the Lucid my patience is waning...how hard can it be to add after a year+ since announced and a wide variety of low end cars currently offering it??
Whatever. They advertised the car would have Android Auto & it's been over a year...they're not meeting consumer expectations.Have you ever built Android Auto into a vehicle? I can pretty much guarantee they’re not just sitting on it going “meh, we’ll get to it eventually, it’s not a big deal and nobody cares.”
Software is hard. It’s not like the movies.
And the price of the car has nothing to do with the difficulty or ease of software engineering.
Exactly what every one said, every day, about CarPlay. Heck, many here were threatening lawsuits.Whatever. They advertised the car would have Android Auto & it's been over a year...they're not meeting consumer expectations.
That isn't the conversation we were having; you asked how hard it could be. I was explaining it can be very hard.Whatever. They advertised the car would have Android Auto & it's been over a year...they're not meeting consumer expectations.
I agree, we are not at all privy to their priorities, and that is annoying. Or the reasons behind their priorities, for that matter. For all we know, a huge percentage of their customers have iPhones, so they consider Android Auto a low priority. That would jibe with recent figures from Apple and some recent statements from auto manufacturers. Typically, new car buyers have about a 70% chance of being iPhone users in the US, according to them. For a luxury brand like Lucid, it could very well be significantly higher.You can argue about development priorities, but the lack of official communication on Android Auto from Lucid is inexcusable. We can only assume that Lucid development is actually
presently working on implementing Android Auto.
Android Auto is supported by over 60 other vehicle manufacturers. Lucid could have implemented and deployed Android Auto months ago. They choose other priorities instead.
Developing a new piece of software can be challenging. However, Google's Android Auto has a well supported, mature development toolkit that many have used successfully to bring Android Auto to their vehicles. The toolkit is designed to make implementation expedient and development is much easier than starting from scratch.
Software is very hard. Too bad someone at Lucid didn't realize that 3 or 4 years ago.Have you ever built Android Auto into a vehicle? I can pretty much guarantee they’re not just sitting on it going “meh, we’ll get to it eventually, it’s not a big deal and nobody cares.”
Software is hard. It’s not like the movies.
And the price of the car has nothing to do with the difficulty or ease of software engineering.
I use Android Auto in our other cars for navigation using Google Maps. It displays the maps on the main screen or HUD so I don't have to look at my phone.I have the GT and another ICE Auto. The other auto has Android Auto, I have never bothered to even set it up. All I want is a great sound system that works 99% of the time. We navigate by Android phone and have for many years. I don’t have the interest or patience to learn manufactures Nav systems and have never found one as good as Google maps.
Sure, this I agree with. I think mistakes were made by a spectacular hardware and automotive engineering team assuming software was easy, just like most people who have never written software.Software is very hard. Too bad someone at Lucid didn't realize that 3 or 4 years ago.
I kind of miss Google Maps too, and sometimes check it before leaving my house. I think it's a little more accurate than the Lucid Navigation, and definitely finds things that the Lucid Navigation doesn't. But the Lucid's navigation is actually pretty good. I've definitely gotten used to using it while waiting for Android Auto to be released.I use Android Auto in our other cars for navigation using Google Maps. It displays the maps on the main screen or HUD so I don't have to look at my phone.
The nav itself is decent. But trying to use Alexa to set a destination doesn't work well at all. That's a big reason why I want AA. For the time being, I'm stuck using my phone to navigate with WazeI kind of miss Google Maps too, and sometimes check it before leaving my house. I think it's a little more accurate than the Lucid Navigation, and definitely finds things that the Lucid Navigation doesn't. But the Lucid's navigation is actually pretty good. I've definitely gotten used to using it while waiting for Android Auto to be released.
Bah, humbug!Happy Android Auto Thursday!!! Just remember that good things come to those who wait.