What's new
By:

Gravity Air Suspension range published!

Attachments

  • IMG_7092.webp
    IMG_7092.webp
    2.5 MB · Views: 127
Lowest
PetevB said:
See if you see camber changing as it goes up and down if you get the chance.
Click to expand...
communicating with driver difficult so pushed the buttons on my own and did not measure anything but height drop
 
037 said:
Lowest

communicating with driver difficult so pushed the buttons on my own and did not measure anything but height drop
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7101.webp
    IMG_7101.webp
    420.1 KB · Views: 104
In both one of the shots above and this one I believe I see noticeable positive camber on the rear wheels at max ride height.
IMG_0182.webp

That look goes away when the car is lowered:
IMG_0183.webp

Maybe we can get some additional angles of the wheels to confirm.
 
PetevB said:
In both one of the shots above and this one I believe I see noticeable positive camber on the rear wheels at max ride height.
View attachment 27634
That look goes away when the car is lowered:
View attachment 27635
Maybe we can get some additional angles of the wheels to confirm.
Click to expand...
Join my group, my phone is giving me a hard time posting photos here

Log into Facebook

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
 
Thanks. So these screen shots from your video look like the opposite. So I can’t tell…
IMG_0185.webp
IMG_0184.webp
 
037 said:
Finger math told a different story
Click to expand...
With the shading in the software image, it's somewhat hard to locate the exact top of the tire.
Also, the software image provides a ground clearance measurement.
I think we (or maybe just me) have been thinking of the distance between the lower part of the body panel and the top of the tire, not ground clearance.

Ground clearance distance does make more sense to know when you think about it from a driving perspective versus the overall apperance.
 
msaunders9430 said:
...
I think we (or maybe just me) have been thinking of the distance between the lower part of the body panel and the top of the tire, not ground clearance.

Ground clearance distance does make more sense to know when you think about it from a driving perspective versus the overall apperance.
Click to expand...
The driving perspective is all I personally care about. I want whatever efficiency improvement might come from hugging the ground a bit more at highway speeds, but the ability to rise up high when I'm going slow in the snow. That said, I have found the discussion speculating how suspension/wheel geometry may vary with ride height to be interesting. I'm not sure I'm discerning enough of a driver to judge the difference, so I guess I'm content to assume that the Lucid engineering team made a good judgement about the various tradeoffs.
 
TahoeMichael said:
The driving perspective is all I personally care about. I want whatever efficiency improvement might come from hugging the ground a bit more at highway speeds, but the ability to rise up high when I'm going slow in the snow. That said, I have found the discussion speculating how suspension/wheel geometry may vary with ride height to be interesting. I'm not sure I'm discerning enough of a driver to judge the difference, so I guess I'm content to assume that the Lucid engineering team made a good judgement about the various tradeoffs.
Click to expand...

Does anyone know what speed(s) are supported at different ride heights? Would love to be able to go 40 mph at 8.2"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Knucklehead
Gravity 75 mph Range
5 6 7
Replies
120
Views
7K
jered
jered
DrZorro
20-ish mile range difference between 5 seat and 7 seat Gravity?
6 7 8
Replies
141
Views
6K
flarbear
F
0
  • Locked
Jan 31 Gravity can charge at Tesla superchargers
Replies
3
Views
498
037
0
DeaneG
Gravity specs we'd like to know
2 3
Replies
48
Views
3K
Gravitas
Gravitas
S
Gravity looks perfect
Replies
13
Views
1K
Pragmatic
P
Back
Top