No, but you’re referring to the large group of people who were impacted by Tesla’s aggressive pricing adjustment and then suggested that Lucid should throw them a bone. A car is significantly more expensive than a Samsung product, where they likely have substantial margins to absorb a loss while still maintaining a profit. Since Lucid isn’t making a profit, your suggestion would put them further into the red.
Well, they actually did it @HC_79, an additional $2k specifically to Tesla owners if they trade in their vehicles, which is exactly what I suggested 4 months ago. I’m glad they were smart enough to seize this opportunity, people are hating their Tesla’s even more now than when we initially discussed this topic.
Well, they actually did it @HC_79, an additional $2k specifically to Tesla owners if they trade in their vehicles, which is exactly what I suggested 4 months ago. I’m glad they were smart enough to seize this opportunity, people are hating their Tesla’s even more now than when we initially discussed this topic.
I believe you suggested a bail out for a Tesla that was significantly underwater. $2K is a great incentive but it’s Apples vs Oranges in what you were originally expecting Lucid to do.
I believe you suggested a bail out for a Tesla that was significantly underwater. $2K is a great incentive but it’s Apples vs Oranges in what you were originally expecting Lucid to do.