You will probably be ok as-is. Based on a 2018 installation date, you almost certainly have a Tesla Generation 2 wall connector. Check the breaker size on your Tesla wall connector circuit. Since your Model 3 will charge at a maximum of 48 amps, I would expect it was installed on a 60 amp (or less) circuit. If that is the case, you should be OK without any changes.So I've seen several threads about this and I'm still a little confused. I have an original Tesla Home Charge from when I bought the M3 in 2018. Will this work without any mods with the Gravity? (I thought I saw a bunch of talk about having to change the wattage or something in the original Tesla chargers. Hope it's compatible as-is.)
Thanks for the info! I'm pretty sure I have a 60amp circuit. (Not at the house now.) Hope it just works as I have to add a new one in a 2nd location...it'd be nice to only buy 1 more. ;-)You will probably be ok as-is. Based on a 2018 installation date, you almost certainly have a Tesla Generation 2 wall connector. Check the breaker size on your Tesla wall connector circuit. Since your Model 3 will charge at a maximum of 48 amps, I would expect it was installed on a 60 amp (or less) circuit. If that is the case, you should be OK without any changes.
If your wall connector is on a 100 amp circuit, you will probably need to get the internal switches in the wall connector adjusted. The people on this forum who had problems with the Generation 2 Tesla wall connectors had them on 100 amp circuits. Those required changes to the internal switch settings.
I'll just stick with my 5yo Grizzl-E Classic. It's "only" 40A, that I have dialed down to 24A. I really have no need for faster home charging. Also safer, just in case.Grizzl-E Ultimate is another solid 80A option if you can ignore the fact that they named the version with NACS "Cyber."
We all have to know our limitationsI'll just stick with my 5yo Grizzl-E Classic. It's "only" 40A, that I have dialed down to 24A. I really have no need for faster home charging. Also safer, just in case.
Home charging is a perfect case for "bigger isn't always better".
Yeah, I think my in-laws had that. They were one of the first owners down here of a model X in 2016 and they had a gen 2 to wall charger installed and I believe it was 80 A both charger and car.I have an 80A Tesla wall connector. They no longer make them though, and it's probably been close to a decade since Tesla made cars that support 80A from an AC connection. There might be some for sale on the used market, or even a new one that somebody never got around to installing. They can also be set to 40A or anything else, so if you get one and want to change the wiring at a later date, it's a matter of opening it up and changing a setting.
I have it wired for 40A because I can't imagine a scenario where I will take a road trip, come back with a nearly depleted battery, and need more than 320 miles of range the next day after an eight hour charge. But anybody who has that need has the option of a faster charging station.
48A * 240V *0.003 miles/Wh or about 35 miles per hour real range. Gravity may display a more optimistic EPA-efficiency based number.Charging speed question. I’ve watched a bunch of charge videos for Gravity, but most focus on high speed charging. If I have a 60A charge, which effectively charged at 48A, how many miles can I accept to get per hour when charging my Gravity?
My R1S is pretty “meh” at 21 miles/hour with 11.1kw….
That’s what I was thinking but my wife’s old Y got 42 miles/hour of range in same circuit, and I feel like Gravity is more efficient.48A * 240V *0.003 miles/Wh or about 35 miles per hour real range. Gravity may display a more optimistic EPA-efficiency based number.
Did it get that, or just report that? Miles per hour is a very imprecise measurement that depends on the accuracy of the efficiency figure used in the calculation. Just look at kW delivered to the car. There's no arguing about how much energy it represents.That’s what I was thinking but my wife’s old Y got 42 miles/hour of range in same circuit, and I feel like Gravity is more efficient.
It actually did get 42 miles of range per hour. Great points in efficiency. X gets about 35. I know that’s now a great measurement, but it’s “real world” to me and easier to understand for the wife…not that she’s not smart, but as soon as I begin explaining, her eyes glaze over nDid it get that, or just report that? Miles per hour is a very imprecise measurement that depends on some big assumprions. Just look at kW delivered to the car. There's no arguing about how much energy it represents.
FWIW I'd expect Gravity to be more efficient than the Model X, but not necessarily more efficient than the Model Y - a smaller, lighter vehicle.