You need LIDAR

Not sure why this guy still gets engagement. You just spent some time correcting almost every single word he typed. No honesty there
 
Notable phantom braking is like a 1 in 10K mile event at least. Meaning genuine hard braking for something that's not needed. Running a red light has to be a 1 in 100K mile even at least. In a geofenced area I'd think it happens less than that.

That puts the odds of those two things happening at like 1 in 40 million
Out of that 100k usually expressway miles where people usually use ADAS, how many lights did it go through? 2?
 
You are literally just making things up now. Waymo does not exclusively validate with synthetic data. They test in the real world literally every day.

I understand you find it fun and useful to regurgitate press release and twitter content, but outright making things up is new, even for you.
With a small number of vehicles

Even when tesla built the cybercab they had 4000 vehicles for testing

That's not the same thing as running the software on millions of cars

An example of this.

If you want examples of a car overturned at night on the freeway, with no lights on, no cars around, no police, and possibly people walking around that you can kill. You need billions of miles of driving in the middle of the night to get sufficient examples of this.

paying a driver to test during these hours is wasteful because you can't test a lot when there's not much interesting data to collect

Only way to collect sufficient examples of this and validate your system works is to test on millions of consumers
 
Last edited:
Back
Top