If you got it, it's yours!
I have not, so far... Just read the news and hoping everyone else but me had!
Could be. Temperature monitoring presumably involves some sort of physical sensor as well, hopefully it is not that.
On the NHTSA recall notice it states the remedy is just the OTA update, no mention of a sensor. There presumably is a sensor but as it is not mentioned as part of the remedy it is reasonable to assume the issue is caused by software only.
www.autoevolution.com
I am not sure why you say this or what you were expecting Lucid to say in the 2.1.26 notes.Between November 10, 2021 and August 31, 2023...
Lucid Recalls Air Because Rear Seats May Overheat, Just Over 1,200 Vehicles Affected
If you own a Lucid Air, make sure to update to software versions 2.1.26 or later because the rear seats of your all-electric sedan may overheat
... and this seems like nice example of how the update summary was woefully insufficient and incomplete, clearly lots more (very useful) information exists. Not simply sharing that info in the first place brings more questions and "bad press/customer relations" than simply being up front and sharing the fully story proactively.
Because just saying "improving operation and control" is a very misleading minimization statement... and such statements always get revealed in the end, even if there is a subset of customers who deny that better communications were possible... it smells of the age old problem that "'it's not the crime, it's the cover-up". Just state the real problem up front... it is the right and respectful thing to do for your customers and your investors, which in turn is the right thing to do for your employees.
And what would they possibly say?
I'd prefer clear, open, and honest (lies by omission are lies) communications...
There’s not a single major corporation on earth that doesn’t pass all their communications through a series of lawyers before they are made public. The problem is solved, why not just move on?
Ok. Now you are ascribing motive with zero proof. Up to now you've just been annoying. Now you are violating our guidelines. I suggest you read them again.
I'd like to add something to this: Ferrari first identified this in July and only now they are recalling it. Lucid identified it much later and fixed it with an immediate OTA and the recall was the same time. Who handled it better? Lucid IMO(keeping in mind they are completely different types of issues, of course).
Recently read about that, shocking how an issue like that could stay for that much time.
