Lease return excess wear & tear

As a moderator, a stockholder, and someone who has a Touring lease coming to an end in December, believe me, I have a vested interest in seeing this situation resolved.

We all like to support the brand and the team, many of whom I have met and like personally. But being supportive includes raising the alarm bells when something this obvious and, frankly dumb, is effecting customers in such a needlessly negative way.

I reserve my criticism for when they really screw things up. And this is one of those times. This needs to be addressed. Yesterday.

It simply cannot be in Lucid's bet interest to let a third-party financial institution destroy their customer loyalty. Over what? Petty cash, in the scheme of things.

I'm no genius businessman. But the day I lose a lifelong client who regularly pays me thousands monthly over a couple of hundred dollars is the day I check into the psych ward. Any ten-year old would tell you to eat the charges on the obvious minor wear and tear and keep the relationship going. If BoA won't eat it fine; Lucid should.

I trust they are looking into it and will figure something out. I just hope it doesn't take too long and cost them too many customers.
 
As a moderator, a stockholder, and someone who has a Touring lease coming to an end in December, believe me, I have a vested interest in seeing this situation resolved.

We all like to support the brand and the team, many of whom I have met and like personally. But being supportive includes raising the alarm bells when something this obvious and, frankly dumb, is effecting customers in such a needlessly negative way.

I reserve my criticism for when they really screw things up. And this is one of those times. This needs to be addressed. Yesterday.

It simply cannot be in Lucid's bet interest to let a third-party financial institution destroy their customer loyalty. Over what? Petty cash, in the scheme of things.

I'm no genius businessman. But the day I lose a lifelong client who regularly pays me thousands monthly over a couple of hundred dollars is the day I check into the psych ward. Any ten-year old would tell you to eat the charges on the obvious minor wear and tear and keep the relationship going. If BoA won't eat it fine; Lucid should.

I trust they are looking into it and will figure something out. I just hope it doesn't take too long and cost them too many customers.
I completely agree with you and I hope something is being done about this.
I'm in the same boat, early investor since $CCIV and I keep on doubling down and bringing my average stock cost lower because I believe in the long-term potential of Lucid. I bought the stock at $50 and at $2, and still HODLing 💎✊
My lease is ending in October, and I'm already considering my other options to avoid going through the lease return process after reading the horror stories here, by either extending the lease or even buying it out (also considering that EV credit is going away), but anything to avoid this pathetic nit picking by BoA, which seem to be known about BoA with other brands btw.
 
Last edited:
Unintended consequences are different from unexpected consequences.

When dealing with raketeers. It is smart to have advanced Protection.

First off - what simple way can one protect oneself at time of lease signing. Is it take it or leave it?

It is my understanding if they wrote it, any omissions ambiguities or multiple definition disputes, the writer does not get to define later, so how about printing out their online terms and make lucid sign and date.

Also, How do you at end give them possession and yet be responsible for damage that may have occurred on their watch.

Our well priced lease on AGT may make it easy to absorb small charges and avoid conflict.

But the GGT and GDE are not priced that way. Reading this thread my wife said ‘I told you so” about little enhancements like bear decals hidden until you open the doors or trunk etc ( label on the inside)

Now we are set to take delivery of a GGT soon and I want protection ( and am not a lawyer and not looking to need one).

Any lawyers or business people have any ideas?

Obviously something that’s fair to Lucid and the buyer (BofA clearly can look out for themselves).

Getting back to ‘take it or leave it’ , who makes orphans? The ‘Leftits!’ Right now the demand gives orphans a home ( we are to be compromising in order to get our baby in hand) but…this?

It’s a problem that needs to be solved. Lucid, define your words and terms.

We want to lease to make everything simple.
 
I’m curious where all the mod defenders are hiding. It seems like they’re always popping up to defend Lucid’s latest missteps.
This is a ridiculous statement.
 
I’m curious where all the mod defenders are hiding. It seems like they’re always popping up to defend Lucid’s latest missteps.
🙄

what is a mod defender and do I get a cool costume
 
Has anyone considered calling a local news "investigates" line? I always thought it was silly, and people may not feel bad for you because we're being screwed on our incredibly expensive car, but those types of exposure often get things done.

I had a home builder try to screw me over and run one time... I contacted the news and the local district attorney, and while I got pennies on the dollar back, the guy was tracked down and paid the price
 
I actually think this is a fantastic class-action consumer fraud lawsuit with the bait and switch between Lucid's clear and unambiguous wear and tear guidelines and whatever the hell BoA is using as their guidelines.
 
I actually think this is a fantastic class-action consumer fraud lawsuit with the bait and switch between Lucid's clear and unambiguous wear and tear guidelines and whatever the hell BoA is using as their guidelines.
And I assume you’re looking forward to your $10 rebate for that class action? Only people that win in litigation are lawyers. Trust me both my parents are lawyers…
 
And I assume you’re looking forward to your $10 rebate for that class action? Only people that win in litigation are lawyers. Trust me both my parents are lawyers…
More like punishing Lucid for their egregious behavior.
 
Y
More like punishing Lucid for their egregious behavior.
You mean Bank of America, N.A. Right? I agree that Bank of America’s conduct sucks. But is not out of character for BofA.

But Lucid has little to no direct control over BofA. As a new auto manufacturer on the block I can see BofA being like “we’ll do whatever we want… try and stop us” and blaming Lucid directly doesn’t help that.

Relationship seems like it’s pretty spelled out here:
IMG_2742.webp

 
More like punishing Lucid for their egregious behavior.

You don’t punish a corporation. You refuse to continue doing business with them. Live and learn.

Best way to send a message to a business is to stop giving them money.

Besides, it’s BoA’s egregious behavior. Lucid could start looking for another financial partner. And I hope they are. But our current leases are tied up with BoA no matter what. So it’s a matter of letting BoA do whatever it’s going to do (since I’m sure Lucid has zero control over them) and making it up to us in some other way.

Like I said, swallowing some of the cost of the more egregious wear and tear claims would be one way to do that. It’s going to hurt the bottom line, but not nearly as much as losing another lease. And another. And another.

This is one of those times where you have to think about the long term. Not the quarter.
 
Back
Top