If
@Adnillien is correct (which I'm pretty sure he is), then this tracks something
@borski pointed out: the software dimension of Lucid power electronics and the powertrain is solid. But it still leaves the issue of why there are so many colossal misfires on the UI/Infotainment end of things.
As Tesla seems to prove with designs that are getting long in the tooth, with propulsion engineering that has ceded its lead to Lucid and others, and with chassis engineering that has gone nowhere since Rawlinson left them over a decade ago, all you really have to give most buyers is UI software with flashy features (even if often cumbersome to use) that work reasonably reliably.
Lucid could do itself in if they don't get to the organizational core of why their UI software execution falls so far behind every other aspect of their products. I still maintain their UI
design puts Tesla's to shame. But their inability five years after the Air UX 1.0 fiasco to make it reliable is still a big mystery to me.