You need to be realistic…..he wasn’t. And I’m no fanboy. I’ve called out Lucid a lot.The irony here is truly unbelievable. You’re calling someone unreasonable while defending a car company like it’s your family bloodline. That is peak fanboy behavior.
A guy points out software glitches, doors not working properly, CarPlay issues, random bugs, and poor refinement on a six-figure luxury car… and your response is “How dare you expect the product to work consistently.” That’s insane.
Nobody said Lucid should be perfect. The point is that when you charge $100k+, people are going to judge the experience at a higher standard. That’s how luxury products work. If the rear doors randomly fail, software bugs happen repeatedly, and core features are unreliable, customers are allowed to criticize it publicly. That’s not “crying.” That’s called being a consumer.
And the “well Ferraris and Range Rovers have issues too” argument is super weak. People criticize those brands constantly for reliability problems too. Expensive cars are not magically immune from criticism just because other expensive cars also have issues.
What’s really bizarre is how extremely emotionally invested you seem in protecting a corporation from feedback. Lucid doesn’t know you. You’re not on the payroll. Yet you’re acting personally offended because someone made a YouTube video about bugs in their car. That level of blind brand loyalty is exactly why companies stop feeling pressure to improve.
Just because it’s a luxury car doesn’t mean it has to be perfect or 100% reliable.
“ Swiss Automatic Watches (Various): Brands like Audemars Piguet or Patek Philippe create incredible mechanical masterpieces, but these items are not "reliable" in the traditional sense. They are highly fragile, require delicate handling, and mandate expensive, routine servicing (costing thousands every 3-5 years) just to keep accurate time“