Lucid does not control when Google releases a new version of Android Auto.
Your assertion is absurd on its face, and the implication that Lucid somehow is withholding Android Auto
because they desire to piss you off is absurd.
Lucid’s software has had plenty of missteps, but has also improved immensely. Name a car that doesn’t have bugs, and I have some oceanside property to sell you in Utah.
That’s really unfortunate, since Android isn’t what makes a car good or bad, but okay. Your survey, your opinion.
Without context, it’s easy to throw stones. Context is everything, as always. Have you ever heard of
Chesterton’s fence? It’s not precisely the same idea, but it’s related to my point about context being everything.
The last line of that post is very good: “You don’t need to be a slave to tradition, but you should approach what already exists with humility and curiosity.”
Instead of making assumptions that everyone on Lucid’s software team sucks, perhaps consider asking questions and being curious about it first, seeking to understand.
For example, building a new company is obviously difficult, and especially building one that makes cars. As a result, you undoubtedly take on a ton of technical debt as a new startup (period) but even more so in something as complicated as an EV.
Lucid is both paying back that technical debt while simultaneously building new features, and that technical debt is what’s bothering you.
But here’s the thing: every single new startup has this problem. Tesla did. Rivian does (and still has plenty of software issues as per their forum). Lucid does.
Ford might not, because they’re not a startup. Hyundai’s software is hot garbage. They still make great cars.
Okay.