You do not need the code for the card. Just tap the card on the microphone (the weird flux capacitor thing) in the middle of the car behind the driver’s right ear.Not going to give them my phone, and the wallet card is fussy and needs the code.
I'm afraid of what would happen at 88mph if I do that...You do not need the code for the card. Just tap the card on the microphone (the weird flux capacitor thing) in the middle of the car behind the driver’s right ear.
Thanks for that info.You do not need the code for the card. Just tap the card on the microphone (the weird flux capacitor thing) in the middle of the car behind the driver’s right ear.
LOLYou do not need the code for the card. Just tap the card on the microphone (the weird flux capacitor thing) in the middle of the car behind the driver’s right ear.
Nonetheless, I think the critique is valid. Lucid knows perfectly well that the EPA is not what most drivers will get. Default range suggestions should be based on actual driver data, not the artificial EPA test. One should have to go digging into the UI to find your EPA based range estimate, and not have it be part of a default display.411 is EPA range. This is standard across the industry. In order to achieve EPA range you should recreate the EPA test environment on your drive. This isn’t unique to Lucid and is true for all EVs or for that matter all vehicles. If you put your destination into the NAV it will show actual range and suggested charging locations.
I think the post is perfectly reasonable. Helpful even, to inform potential buyers. I think it's true that internet forums tend to attract people with complaints more than they do happy customers. But even so, it's still a useful perspective for someone like me who is trying to decide whether I should buy a Lucid or not.Post like this make me think……me me me, why post? Why the need to rub this into other Lucid owners faces? Who cares if you bought or sold the stock. So you depreciated 5k, other new car buyers lost 50k, so what?
Go live your life, no need to go around forums posting about your life…..give me a break!
Yeah, but you don’t say “ I sold the stock” or you lost 50k while I lost 5k, that’s us pretty shitty comment.I think the post is perfectly reasonable. Helpful even, to inform potential buyers. I think it's true that internet forums tend to attract people with complaints more than they do happy customers. But even so, it's still a useful perspective for someone like me who is trying to decide whether I should buy a Lucid or not.
It's less Lucid's fault and more of the EPA/industry as a whole and the gaming of the data. Why would Lucid handicap themselves by advertising a "real" range when Tesla can tout 300+ miles when in real world they are seeing close to 200s? I agree that it's not right, but I don't fault Lucid for doing it.Nonetheless, I think the critique is valid. Lucid knows perfectly well that the EPA is not what most drivers will get. Default range suggestions should be based on actual driver data, not the artificial EPA test. One should have to go digging into the UI to find your EPA based range estimate, and not have it be part of a default display.
I literally just tried it. It works fine. I just handed my card to a valet two days ago and they used it fine, without my pin, once I told them to tap it on that spot.LOL
You got me Borski. Nice one.
I was able to get inside the car by holding the wallet card over the camera. Then the car went completely dark, and holding the card over the flux capacitor just set off the alarm. Lucid has so many ways to make the owner look ridiculous.
Some day I hope to see a post that tells me how to disable all the locks permanently.
Bobby?
View attachment 34390car keys from my generation View attachment 34389
By this logic; which should Lucid advertise? Someone who drive below the speed limit's range; someone who drive just right about it; or someone who doesn't care about the speed limit's ? I think this debate is useless. I never heard anyone complaining about their ICE car not doing the advertised mile/gallon.Nonetheless, I think the critique is valid. Lucid knows perfectly well that the EPA is not what most drivers will get. Default range suggestions should be based on actual driver data, not the artificial EPA test. One should have to go digging into the UI to find your EPA based range estimate, and not have it be part of a default display.
OK now I've got to go to my garage later and try it.I literally just tried it. It works fine. I just handed my card to a valet two days ago and they used it fine, without my pin, once I told them to tap it on that spot.![]()
Sometimes it takes tapping it twice. But it does work.
It did go very dark in the car when I put the card up there. I may have entered a wormhole. How long is a "tap" in spacetime? How many "taps" is a "tap" ? Do I leave the car door open or close it (the car locked me in and car alarm went off when I tired to open it)? How the F does a tow truck driver/ valet know how to do this and I, who have had the car over three years and read the owner's manual dozens of times, can't ? Can Bobby post a video of a "tap" ?OK now I've got to go to my garage later and try it.Maybe Cosmo activated the flux capacitor and that's how it works in 2030
![]()
Then stop replying to it. Ignore it. Trust me, someone will dig it up. Count on the good will of some dearly forum members.Sorry to grouse, but I think it would be nice to have topics like fobs and key cards appear in a relevant thread rather than seeing this awful banner resurface ad nauseum...
Perhaps... I know that my credit card (complete with its little symbol that it supports "tap & pay") has never worked at any "tap & pay" (it does work in the slot based readers though), no matter who does the "tapping".Perhaps I don't know what "tap" means.