This isn't acceptable for a second vehicle to say "wait 2 years". Yes, the Air could be given a free pass as it was Lucid's first model and I know they've overhauled the software in the Gravity but the bugs that are occurring just shows that Lucid's QA \ QC is lacking. Kyle is right, this car has been out for 9 months and these little bugs should have been squashed long ago.
I agree but some of the bugs are just plain stupid. How on earth can you not send an address from your phone to the car and have it figure out how to navigate that address when it's been available on the Air for years. Can't save an LED lighting profile, etc. it's little things, but when they've been producing these cars since December last year it's kind of becoming hard to defend Lucid on the software front. The bugs are nothing major like we saw on the Air, they're little enough to be not a dealbreaker but happen constantly enough to just be plain annoying.
When it comes to Kyle, I find it hilarious in here that when he's 100% pro Lucid everyone is cheering but the moment he's says something critical then out come the daggers. I don't think his comments were unreasonable, he loves the Gravity but lets call a spade a spade, Lucid needs to get its act together on software! There's no question about that. Yes, Kyle can nitpick but it's not like he's lying the car has software issues. I keep going back to this example, but is 9 months acceptable to not be able to fix a bug that can't send addresses from your phone and have the car navigate to that address? I would say it's definitely not acceptable and this is the issue, it's Lucid's slowness to react on bugs like that, which is the real concern.
Kyle's got a list, some of it will be legit and others will be nitpicking which he openly admits he does but how many more lists are going to start coming out as the car becomes more readily available for reviewers to get its hands on.