What's new
By:

Where is UX 3.0 for the Air?

Pops said:
I was told by an employee of lucid that the release is dropping in September, so next week or so should be it.
Click to expand...
In our dreams 😂
Lucid timelines are always day promised + months/years never on the day.
 
sri said:
In our dreams 😂
Lucid timelines are always day promised + months/years never on the day.
Click to expand...
They seemed pretty adamant it's happening but yeah ya never know until it happens.
 
I had the new chip installed 2 weeks ago, so, hoping so! And - the Philadelphia (King of Prussia) service team was awesome as usual. Gave me a Gravity loaner (I like my AT so much better), fixed the front door wind noise and were just great. And made no promises re: 3.0. Other than the occasional gnatty software hiccups, my experience with my AT and servicing have been trouble-free.
 
1788129384959.webp

I didnt say chatgpt about Lucid 😂
The worst cannot be longer than Sep 7th, i have 0 hopes 🤣
1788129520720.webp
 
If someone wants to sue Lucid over this, have fun with that. You’ll make at least one lawyer rich.

Meanwhile, it does sound like they are at least not planning on scrapping the project. Which means it was likely far enough along that it still makes sense to release. Good.

In that case, I would expect it before year’s end, if for no other reason than they need to be all hands on deck for Cosmos software for most of next year, if they plan on shipping a car that isn’t full of half-completed features and bugs.
 
joec said:
If someone wants to sue Lucid over this, have fun with that. You’ll make at least one lawyer rich.

Meanwhile, it does sound like they are at least not planning on scrapping the project. Which means it was likely far enough along that it still makes sense to release. Good.

In that case, I would expect it before year’s end, if for no other reason than they need to be all hands on deck for Cosmos software for most of next year, if they plan on shipping a car that isn’t full of half-completed features and bugs.
Click to expand...
Most of the communication around this occurred in Q1 and referenced late summer or fall. There was a push to get some social media press around 3.0 with some reports on expected features. I know that Engineering Explained did a video on the topic before his vehicle was reclaimed.

It was also mentioned as a 2026 objective in the investor day presentation. But so were a number of initiatives that likely won’t come to fruition this year. It does however suggest that it was far enough along that we should be seeing UX 3.0 at some point. And while l would agree that failing to deliver likely wouldn’t rise to the level of supporting litigation, it would undermine the credibility of the new leadership who have acknowledged dropping the ball on meeting customer expectations.
 
Northpointe said:
Most of the communication around this occurred in Q1 and referenced late summer or fall. There was a push to get some social media press around 3.0 with some reports on expected features. I know that Engineering Explained did a video on the topic before his vehicle was reclaimed.

It was also mentioned as a 2026 objective in the investor day presentation. But so were a number of initiatives that likely won’t come to fruition this year. It does however suggest that it was far enough along that we should be seeing UX 3.0 at some point. And while l would agree that failing to deliver likely wouldn’t rise to the level of supporting litigation, it would undermine the credibility of leadership who have acknowledged dropping the ball on meeting customer expectations.
Click to expand...
The problem legally is not failing to deliver. The problem is charging a thousand dollars for a feature that was not delivered. Sure, the update speeded some things up slightly, but you can't take money for a feature and not deliver it, as Elon is slowly finding out.
 
azguy said:
The problem legally is not failing to deliver. The problem is charging a thousand dollars for a feature that was not delivered. Sure, the update speeded some things up slightly, but you can't take money for a feature and not deliver it, as Elon is slowly finding out.
Click to expand...
They did deliver what you paid for, an upgraded computer. I'm sure nowhere in your paperwork does it say that you are buying or unlocking some sort of software version.
 
Bobby said:
They did deliver what you paid for, an upgraded computer. I'm sure nowhere in your paperwork. Does it say that you are buying or unlocking some sort of software version.
Click to expand...
We're just going round and round, and you are entitled to your opinion. I was induced by Lucid to buy an upgrade for a particular purpose. I can find a thousand cases where restitution had to be made under similar circumstances. Personally, I believe they will deliver on it. I have no idea when. Suit yourself.
 
azguy said:
The problem legally is not failing to deliver. The problem is charging a thousand dollars for a feature that was not delivered.
Click to expand...
You got a new CCCv2, which nobody told you you had to do. The upgraded CCC was the delivered product, not UX3.0.

They never promised CCCv2 would get you UX3.0; they only said CCCv1 would not. And that is still true.

But you have not paid a dime for UX3.0.

azguy said:
Sure, the update speeded some things up slightly, but you can't take money for a feature and not deliver it, as Elon is slowly finding out.
Click to expand...
They did not take money for UX 3.0.

Even if someone told you it was coming, that is not what you paid for. The way you know this is they could still charge for a UX3.0 upgrade today (not that they would or should) and there would be no legal issue for that, as what you paid for originally was… the new CCCv2, which you got.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top