I feel like Lucid's approach to this launch is a bit of a head scratcher:
Outside of a few details and a silhouette shown at Lucid's investor day, we haven't really heard anything from Lucid on Cosmos. I don't doubt that they can start the production line at the end of this year or early next, so I'm a bit confused.
Looking at Rivian, Tesla, and even Lucid's past, it seems like the norm is to start hyping up the car at least a year before production commencement. We're approaching 6 months with no reveal in sight. I don't think most prospective customers know Lucid has an upcoming midsize vehicle, let alone that it's starting production as early as the end of this year.
I know traditional OEMs typically have tight launch to production timelines, but is that what they're looking to replicate? If I were to guess, any one of the following might be driving the later than usual reveal:
1) They want Cosmos software to be in good shape at reveal to quell the likely concerns about software.
2) They want Gravity software to be really good to avoid having that negative press tied to Cosmos.
3) OEMs (especially Chinese ones) have significantly reduced development timelines. They don't want to show their hand and have others quickly replicate their design/ideas.
Any other ideas?
Outside of a few details and a silhouette shown at Lucid's investor day, we haven't really heard anything from Lucid on Cosmos. I don't doubt that they can start the production line at the end of this year or early next, so I'm a bit confused.
Looking at Rivian, Tesla, and even Lucid's past, it seems like the norm is to start hyping up the car at least a year before production commencement. We're approaching 6 months with no reveal in sight. I don't think most prospective customers know Lucid has an upcoming midsize vehicle, let alone that it's starting production as early as the end of this year.
I know traditional OEMs typically have tight launch to production timelines, but is that what they're looking to replicate? If I were to guess, any one of the following might be driving the later than usual reveal:
1) They want Cosmos software to be in good shape at reveal to quell the likely concerns about software.
2) They want Gravity software to be really good to avoid having that negative press tied to Cosmos.
3) OEMs (especially Chinese ones) have significantly reduced development timelines. They don't want to show their hand and have others quickly replicate their design/ideas.
Any other ideas?