Another interesting point you bring up is that this is a 'known' design flaw by Lucid. This is what i have been saying from the start and this is my grouse with this repair bill. Will anyone on this forum, who support Lucid, pay to fix an issue that arises out of a design flaw that the car has. Is it the responsibility of the owner/leasor to pay to fix issues that arise out of a design defect/flaw?There’s a few things to break down here.
- The manual says don’t do this in a very clear manner. What is at fault here is pretty black and white at this point.
- It’s worth acknowledging most if not all EV manufacturers have electronic components hidden in these particular areas.
- Trunks and frunks are high traffic areas for damp items and are prone to getting a little wet.
We don’t know how much liquid was spilled, but I’m going to guess it wasn’t much more than a plant pot leaking water? Lucid should be better about this. They don’t even sell a proper weather floor mat for the top portion of the trunk which is unacceptable given this as the circumstance. I should be able to put a bag of ice in my car without concern for car failure.
Both parties are at fault IMO.
To iterate, a design flaw like this (and it is a “known” design flaw per Lucid) doesn’t make it a bad car, but does urge some education to prevent a large headache. It also justifies a little pressure to change it from us.