This is completely apolitical - I don’t believe the tariff/trade war environment explains the supply shortage.
Parts are not suddenly unavailable. They’re just more expensive. It strains credulity to think that a car company that really needs to show Wall Street and the world that they can sell this new model would risk the black eye of pulling back an option and delaying shipments/launch over more expensive HUD parts. The HUD is part of a $3200 technology package; I think it’s a stretch to think that this is even a $500 cost part or set of parts that would hold up shipments. Even if we assume the highest tariff rates, I can’t make it make sense for a company to not just eat $1000 of cost per vehicle for a while, at the cost of shifting millions in demand back to the fall (and some lost sales). And honestly I’d guess the added cost would be less than that.
All for a part that should have been in stock well before the highest tariffs went into effect (not even a month ago - remember Gravity’s were supposed to be in showrooms in April).
I think you have to be really, uhh, friendly to accept that as the explanation.
I’ve said this before but I think a much simpler explanation is that the design is/was delivered late. Maybe now it’s in the supplier’s hands so they can semi-credibly say that, well, we don’t have parts. But the fact that I don’t think anyone’s seen a full-version, head-placement-adapting augmented reality full functionality version of this thing actually working, even in a cobbled together pre-production unit with pre-production or prototype parts, is a telling sign.
I guess we’ll see when DE orders are delivered, but even if they work, I think late design delivery is a more credible explanation than tariffs.