Purluxe Premium vs Leather

My wife and I test drove an Air with the Purluxe, and she complained strongly about the scratchy fabric on her arm. Wife not happy = no sale. We bought one with the Mojave leather and wife is happy.
 
My wife and I test drove an Air with the Purluxe, and she complained strongly about the scratchy fabric on her arm. Wife not happy = no sale. We bought one with the Mojave leather and wife is happy.
I fully understand why Lucid has premade cars with standardized seat setups. But if one is ordering from the factory, I don't understand why the seat material is not a separate choice from the seat color. Pretty much every other luxury car company that lets you order from the factory lets you select the material separately from the color. If the seats are otherwise identical, why not allow the separation?
 
I have mojave purluxe in my '25 Air. It's not bothersome to me or my wife at all. We really like the look and feel and the contrast with other wood and trim in the cabin. 🤷‍♂️
 
Whoa...wait a second...

Am I missing something here? "Mojave", from what I see in the Gravity configuration choices, ONLY comes in base Purluxe or Purluxe Premium, no leather option.
If they had a black leather option I would have ordered it for my GGT
Thus, my question to @Bair and @socktucker is WTH is "Mojave leather" ?
Is that just a choice for Air and not Gravity??
 
Whoa...wait a second...

Am I missing something here? "Mojave", from what I see in the Gravity configuration choices, ONLY comes in base Purluxe or Purluxe Premium, no leather option.
If they had a black leather option I would have ordered it for my GGT
Thus, my question to @Bair and @socktucker is WTH is "Mojave leather" ?
Is that just a choice for Air and not Gravity??
Yeah I have an Air sorry. It’s more like a grey.
 
Since the primary purpose of my GGT was to be the utility hauler (dogs, bikes, stuff), I went with the Purluxe. It's definitely not quite as 'premium' looking (or feeling) as the Tahoe interior of our AGT, but it's perfectly fine, and in the month that I've had it, there are no issues related to durability (no surprise). And as far as the 'burlap'- total non-issue for me, but I understand that YMMV. I especially liked the fact that I could comfortably rest on the armrest of the Gravity when I tested it, and I'm still very pleased with the overall seating/driving/comfort of the Purluxe. The one thing that I have noticed about the black interior is that it really shows scuffs and dirt on the threshold of the doors. I have to wipe it off weekly, and that's not ever been an issue with the Air. Otherwise, as I said, I love the car, the look, and pretty much everything else about the car.
 
Since the primary purpose of my GGT was to be the utility hauler (dogs, bikes, stuff), I went with the Purluxe. It's definitely not quite as 'premium' looking (or feeling) as the Tahoe interior of our AGT, but it's perfectly fine, and in the month that I've had it, there are no issues related to durability (no surprise).

I actually do find it to be a surprise. I've been super careful with my Air and there's multiple tears in my driver's seat after only 11k miles.

Thankfully Lucid is replacing the seats, but I'm concerned about it for the remaining 2.5 years on my lease.
 
The driver's seat on my Air (30,000 miles) has a small wear tear right in the middle of the bottom cushion caused just by my butt rotating on the cushion when getting in and out. The rear seat has a tear in the bottom cushion. The rear one is on me, but I've carried similar objects in the back of my leather equipped Jaguar with no ill effects.
Plus the carpeting on the back of the rear seat fold down is very wear prone. I've taken to placing a piece of old carpet down so my skis don't further damage it. Something I never gave to do with any of my other cars.
 
And you're misunderstanding my comments.

Even if your ideal sitting position has only light pressure on the armrest (which I don't believe was done independently of the burlap on the armrests), that doesn't mean other drivers or passengers in your car (it's on the back seat armrests, too) will find their sitting position at an equal armrest avoidance.

It's a huge issue, and Lucid almost lost a sale because of it. Had we been not OK with leather (some people want animal-free interiors), as well as spending thousands more, Lucid would have lost this sale. Even as it is, the Ojai leather interior color was so bad had that been the only leather option, Lucid would have lost the sale.
I think it’s not a huge issue at all. I have purluxe in both my Air and Gravity. Neither are scratchy to me or my wife. We are the only two drivers of the car. Outside of us, We could care less about what the other passengers in the car think about the armrest material (which happens to be my kids, who could care less). I think if you and your spouse or who ever is actually in those seats 99% of the time likes it, it just doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks.

So, why is that silly again? We like the look. It’s profoundly nicer appearing than any of the leather options on Gravity. In fact, contrary to your comment, Lucid GAINED a sale precisely because the Yosemite interior was so appealing to us. Does everyone who doesn’t see the interior your way have to be silly?
 
So, why is that silly again?
As I said:
Having driving position dictated by not being able to rest one's arm on the armrest is, frankly, silly.
If you want to "care less about what other passengers" think and feel, fine. If wear long sleeves all the time, fine. If you're not sensitive enough on your arms for it to matter, fine.

But, if you have to change your otherwise normal driving position because Lucid put uncomfortable fabric where you would want to rest your amr(s), then it's silly to have to change that position. IMO, of course.
 
I'm still stuck on the different materials on each arm.

Wherever you stand on the issue of whether the fabric is comfortable or not, it's not the same material that your other elbow rests on.

They should have either put the fabric on the center console armrest area to match, or put the purluxe leatherette on the door side - both or neither, not a mix.
 
I have found that the door armrest in the Gravity is too low for my elbow to even reach. My wife says the same thing about the passenger side. That's why the Yosemite purluxe armrest fabric has not been an issue for us. It has also been easy to clean -- we have two small children, and I have easily cleaned mud off the wool fabric and other surfaces
 
Not a showroom test, but a 24hr test drive (thank you Lucid!) concerned me more about seat compliance, than material. After, 1.5-2.0 Tahoe hours, butt was getting sore. These seats match a trend toward firm. Adjustability, thigh support and to some extent massage can mitigate, but why seats simply don't "give" like they used to I don't understand. I got into a 12-way, non-massage, Pureluxe, on the way out and noticed I sank deeper. Ah. Also noticed, unlike GM, I could get weight better dissipated on the bench despite it being 12 way, not 18, adjustable. Even without extending thigh support, I found all the Gravity benches still rake adequately to support the thighs (6'200lb). So, oddly, I'm realizing there are arguments for closer-to-base trim Gravity. The test's purpose was feeling out the non-Dynamic Handling Package. Here, too, I was really impressed with the standard suspension, coming from a firmer coil car.

I agree it would be nice to mix/match materials, colors and adjustability, understanding it is difficult to make so many options. My concern with Purluxe, a synthetic, is sweat when hot. Most inventory is dark. Going for added compliance and dropping "premium" seats means losing cooling, among other things. AI judged firmness a product of the added features in the Premium seats. Perhaps less room?
 
[…]I got into a 12-way, non-massage, Pureluxe, on the way out and noticed I sank deeper. Ah. Also noticed, unlike GM, I could get weight better dissipated on the bench despite it being 12 way, not 18, adjustable. […]. AI judged firmness a product of the added features in the Premium seats. Perhaps less room?

Very interesting! I got the premium/luxury seats and the things I noticed:
  • Seats definitely could use more padding. During a 6 hour drive (with one charge/potty/food stop - range is great), I need to shift and wiggle. The massage helped (reason for reduced padding?), but more padding is desirable.
  • Seats are too big for shorter adults. There is a thigh/leg adjustment, but even setting it to the shortest extension, the seat is too long.
  • More lumbar support is needed. I have it at max lumbar support and it’s not enough.
Our gold standard is the Volvo XC90. Wonderful seats with high adjustability.
 
Very interesting! I got the premium/luxury seats and the things I noticed:
  • Seats definitely could use more padding. During a 6 hour drive (with one charge/potty/food stop - range is great), I need to shift and wiggle. The massage helped (reason for reduced padding?), but more padding is desirable.
  • Seats are too big for shorter adults. There is a thigh/leg adjustment, but even setting it to the shortest extension, the seat is too long.
  • More lumbar support is needed. I have it at max lumbar support and it’s not enough.
Our gold standard is the Volvo XC90. Wonderful seats with high adjustability.
Interesting observations. I have the Yosemite Purluxe - I think they are quite comfortable for long distance driving and the 18-way adjustable allows me or my wife (who is much shorter) to adjust the side bolsters and thigh extension to a really supportive position in our profiles. Massage and cooling makes it even better of course. About to take a five hour journey Tahoe Thursday and will report back, but the 3hr ones I’ve taken already have been really great.

I would not have guessed the leather seats to be less comfortable than Purluxe. But certainly the ‘give’ may differ.
 
These seats match a trend toward firm.
I agree, picked up my Gravity in January. The seat bottoms in the Gravity are definitely firm to hard, no give at all when sitting on them. Compared to the Model Y where the seat is a lot softer and you kind of get absorbed by the seat as you sit.
 
Very interesting! I got the premium/luxury seats and the things I noticed:
  • Seats definitely could use more padding. During a 6 hour drive (with one charge/potty/food stop - range is great), I need to shift and wiggle. The massage helped (reason for reduced padding?), but more padding is desirable.
  • Seats are too big for shorter adults. There is a thigh/leg adjustment, but even setting it to the shortest extension, the seat is too long.
  • More lumbar support is needed. I have it at max lumbar support and it’s not enough.
Our gold standard is the Volvo XC90. Wonderful seats with high adjustability.
I have yet to sit in any vehicle's stock seat and think that the lumbar support is good. Lucid fails in that regard, but sadly I've given up hope of feeling like a car seat actually fits me properly.
 
After going back, I think I was wrong about it being 12 way vs 18 way. It indeed seemed to be the material, as 18 way Pureluxe felt fine and the hanging samples show big contrast in elasticity; pureluxe stretches, leather doesn't.
 
I agree, picked up my Gravity in January. The seat bottoms in the Gravity are definitely firm to hard, no give at all when sitting on them. Compared to the Model Y where the seat is a lot softer and you kind of get absorbed by the seat as you sit.
I guess different people are built differently and/or think different things are comfortable. Don't forget, you don't get lumbar adjustment on Model 3/Y front passenger seats anymore.

Back in 2020, one of the reasons we got a Model X over a Model Y was the seat comfort. Air suspension was another reason.

But, we like the 18-way Tahoe seats in out Gravity GT better than either the 2020 or the 2023 Model X.
 
Back
Top