Gravity SW update inbound...

To be clear: this would be fine. If someone has actually had significant experience as a CEO or COO or similar of a major public company . . . .

How about someone who has sat in the offices and conference rooms of CEO's of large, publicly-held companies to help them noodle through staffing and organization questions?
 
How about someone who has sat in the offices and conference rooms of CEO's of large, publicly-held companies to help them noodle through staffing and organization questions?
I don't recall ever telling you to shut up. :)
 
Re: Armchair CEO'ing:

It seems frowned upon here, and often it is alleged that it is "against the rules." Is it? If it really is, and really will be clamped down on by the mods, then might I humbly suggest that it be stated as such in the forum guidelines?
 
I think it's very positive that Lucid's PR team is acknowledging the need to address software bugs, and that they "still have more work to do." Public statements like this create urgency for the company to follow through, and I am sure they know that when they choose to say it. (Unlike some others on this forum, I think that Lucid chooses its words very carefully, so that it can keep the promises it makes.)

I am not qualified to speculate on how Lucid should follow through, either from a technical or organizational standpoint, but I like what I hear.
 
J
I think it's very positive that Lucid's PR team is acknowledging the need to address software bugs, and that they "still have more work to do." Public statements like this create urgency for the company to follow through, and I am sure they know that when they choose to say it. (Unlike some others on this forum, I think that Lucid chooses its words very carefully, so that it can keep the promises it makes.)

I am not qualified to speculate on how Lucid should follow through, either from a technical or organizational standpoint, but I like what I hear.
both those EE and OOS videos lit a fire….otherwise they were dragging their feet thinking all is ok.
 
J

both those EE and OOS videos lit a fire….otherwise they were dragging their feet thinking all is ok.
This pending software update is probably weeks if not months in the works. The only thing the EE and OOS videos might have effected is Nick Tworks “announcement” of the pending update.
 
J

both those EE and OOS videos lit a fire….otherwise they were dragging their feet thinking all is ok.
Respectfully, this is nonsense.

Lucid engineers, their leadership, and board of directors are WELL aware the software may kill the company. They are most certainly burning the candle at both ends to improve the experience. They are not stupid.
 
Re: Armchair CEO'ing:

It seems frowned upon here, and often it is alleged that it is "against the rules." Is it? If it really is, and really will be clamped down on by the mods, then might I humbly suggest that it be stated as such in the forum guidelines?
It used to be. It got removed to simplify the guidelines some time ago, iirc, and because it seemed overly broad.

But I could be misremembering, too.
 
OK, so then, it is NOT against the rules?

In that case.....

If *I* were in charge of this forum......

😇
 
I think that Lucid chooses its words very carefully, so that it can keep the promises it makes.)
Do they though?

"NEWARK, CA – July 15, 2025 – Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID), maker of the world’s most advanced electric vehicles, today announced a major update to its DreamDrive® Pro suite of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) to deliver Hands-Free Drive Assist and Hands-Free Lane Change Assist1 to its award-winning lineup of electric vehicles. These and other vehicle enhancements will be available as an over-the-air (OTA) update for Lucid Air owners, scheduled for July 30, and for Lucid Gravity owners later this year."
 
OK, so then, it is NOT against the rules?

In that case.....

If *I* were in charge of this forum......

😇

Are you seriously suggesting that people who own Lucid stock and Lucid products should be blocked from speculating on and discussing what might or might not be going on inside the company? The fact that it might be based on limited access to facts should not matter unless the person posting is claiming to have actual knowledge they do not.

It would be analogous to banning public discussion and questioning of what someone thinks may be happening with government just because the person opining is not behind the closed doors of government or has not held a government position himself.
 
Respectfully, this is nonsense.

Lucid engineers, their leadership, and board of directors are WELL aware the software may kill the company. They are most certainly burning the candle at both ends to improve the experience. They are not stupid.
You're right, but it's also true that they didn't speak up until these videos were posted. Unfair to all the owners here who've been saying the exact same things for months.
 
You're right, but it's also true that they didn't speak up until these videos were posted. Unfair to all the owners here who've been saying the exact same things for months.
They are a public company. They are much less free about what they can say and when they can say it than, for example, owners here.

But them not saying it doesn’t mean they’re ignorant idiots.
 
Can we please bring this one back to purpose of the incoming software update? There are other threads, or you can start them, for the other stuff (which is interesting, but not for here IMO).
 
Whoa, I'm suggesting nothing, it's not my forum.

This is a private forum and it can have whatever rules it wants. Obviously the government cannot block speech about Lucid, but a private forum can, and the mods can enforce them, if they want to.

My only suggestion was that if certain behaviors were unwelcome here, it might be nice if the lines were drawn clearly and effectively. Having been on the wrong side of the "armchair CEO" accusation in the past, I remember the confusion of wondering "hey, i read the rules, and I don't remember seeing that" and then going back and re-reading the rules and saying "yeah, still not seeing it."

I just saw an opportunity for us to clarify whether or not this forum wants to allow that or not.

I'm still not sure I'm clear though 😅
 
Can we please bring this one back to purpose of the incoming software update? There are other threads, or you can start them, for the other stuff (which is interesting, but not for here IMO).
Well that's no fun.

Even once updates have fixed all the current bugs, we still will need to talk about how it took them so long and they possibly came too late (everybody has left the party), etc.
To all of that Cher would say ...

 
Whoa, I'm suggesting nothing, it's not my forum.

This is a private forum and it can have whatever rules it wants. Obviously the government cannot block speech about Lucid, but a private forum can, and the mods can enforce them, if they want to.

My only suggestion was that if certain behaviors were unwelcome here, it might be nice if the lines were drawn clearly and effectively. Having been on the wrong side of the "armchair CEO" accusation in the past, I remember the confusion of wondering "hey, i read the rules, and I don't remember seeing that" and then going back and re-reading the rules and saying "yeah, still not seeing it."

I just saw an opportunity for us to clarify whether or not this forum wants to allow that or not.

I'm still not sure I'm clear though 😅
All fair. We, the mods, should take another look at the guidelines; we do it every so often, and it's been a while.
 
Do they though?

"NEWARK, CA – July 15, 2025 – Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID), maker of the world’s most advanced electric vehicles, today announced a major update to its DreamDrive® Pro suite of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) to deliver Hands-Free Drive Assist and Hands-Free Lane Change Assist1 to its award-winning lineup of electric vehicles. These and other vehicle enhancements will be available as an over-the-air (OTA) update for Lucid Air owners, scheduled for July 30, and for Lucid Gravity owners later this year."

Genuine question: did they not do this for the Air? (I have an Air Pure, so I wouldn't have seen an ADAS-related update, anyway.) As for the Gravity, year ain't over yet!
 
Back
Top