The article reads like a Tesla ad for a reason. Generally speaking, their network appears to be more complete and reliable with respect to fast charging. I have never owned a Tesla and it wasn't on my list to consider when I was looking to replace my BMW M5. I primarily charge my Lucid at home or at my lake house. I choose not to take it on any long road trips due to the charging worries. The southeastern US in not ready for mass EV adoption. The few times I have taken my car from Charlotte to Atlanta or to Chapel Hill, I experienced the same sorts of issues that they did, chargers not working, limited opportunities to charge, etc. I was usually able to charge, but that probably would not be the case if EV adoption was much greater.
Public charging is a huge problem with respect to EV adoption in certain parts of the country. The vast majority of people cannot make a purchasing decision of this magnitude without considering the possibility that they might need to take their vehicle on a long journey. Sure 90%+ of the time they will be fine being able to rely on home charging. It's the other 10% that might cause them to make a different purchase decision. If my budget is tight, why would I buy a car that presents that worry. It is the primary reason that I will not purchase an EV for my wife. We need her car to be an ICE vehicle to make trips to the beach, New Orleans, Nashville, etc., longer trips where I might hesitate taking the Lucid. I can't imagine the experience of packing young kids up in the car to drive to Disney World from Charlotte and having to charge along the way, especially if the number of EV's on the road were higher.
I am not even going to get in the determination of if the energy I use to charge comes from a clean energy source because I really don't know and it might lead down a political rabbit hole.
So let me get this straight: 90% of the need is for home charging, but 100% of our focus should be on improving public charging for those 1-2 road trips per year? Makes perfect sense.
Let's start with the obvious: Many, many American families have more than one car. There's zero reason you can't have an EV while your wife has an ICE car. If everyone did that much, we'd be 50% of the way there. That instantly solves the "road trip" problem for the majority of people.
With the cost savings from gas, oil changes, other maintenance, you could rent a car for those 1-2 road trips and still come out ahead. So even those without 2 cars could likely break even with an EV, at least.
If we vastly improved access to home charging (by mandating it in new home building and apartment complexes, by adding strong financial incentives for legacy home owners, and by eliminating these stupid "Free public charging" incentives EV makers keep giving away) public EV charging would be limited to only those who are taking road trips. That would eliminate much of the congestion happening now with folks treating fast charging like they do local gas stations.
We will never need nearly as many public chargers as we currently have gas stations. We just need them in the right places, and we need them to be reliable. Which is an issue, since that means it's likely never going to be as strong a business as gas stations are currently. Which is why I keep saying public charging is a best treated as a loss leader for existing businesses along interstates. Restaurants, convenience stores, hotels, and so on.
So I repeat: The real issue with EV adoption is home charging and access to clean energy. Yes, EVs are still too expensive, too. But I also think that issue is largely overblown. The average selling price of new cars in the US is not that far off from an entry-level Model 3, Bolt, etc. And that will solve itself as more people buy EVs and production costs decrease.
Folks are looking for excuses NOT to buy an EV. And the media keep feeding it to them, rather than educating us on basic facts. We get nothing but a daily litany about the drawbacks, while no one ever talks about the obvious benefits.