Another Perspective from Tyson's Corner

Joined
Apr 10, 2025
Messages
40
Reaction score
44
Location
Silk Hope, NC
Cars
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5
Like several other forum members, I test drove the Gravity at the Tyson’s Corner event last week. I wanted to share my thoughts and perspectives.

First, as some have noted, the test drive sucked. We went on a set route on some city streets around the moll. It lasted much less than 20 minutes, and I swear that I spent half of it stopped at red lights. I got hardly any sense of the vehicles dynamics. A few things that I was able to glean: Gravity was very quick to respond to steering inputs. The ride was very smooth and quiet, even on the 22/23” wheels (though this was at low speeds on relatively smooth roads). The couple of times I was able to press the accelerator a bit more, I got a little sense of the great power delivery. I felt the mass of the car in a good way as a strong push against my back. One-pedal driving was fantastic—the regen was strong, seamless, intuitive, and easy to control. I’m still not sold on the squircle steering wheel. I like that I could set it low, and it doesn’t block the view of the screen, but grabbing the top of the “wheel” as I normally do when making a turn on a city street felt very awkward to me. The turn signal stalk was a little too far behind the wheel, and it required a long throw past a heavy detent to fully engage. I usually ended up just flashing the turn signal, not completely turning it on. The windshield extending over your head is a cool effect, though it’s odd to have the sun visor running across the view. The day was completely overcast, so I couldn’t tell if it would bother me to have the sun shining down from overhead while I drive.

As for the non-driving impressions:

Gravity looks great in-person. It makes sense to call in an SUV because that’s exactly how it functions—sport and utility. It just breaks the rules for what an SUV should look like, as it incorporates elements that are similar to SUVs, minivans, and wagons. The wheelbase still looks a little too long to me, but it’s beautiful overall. I especially noticed how low the roof was when standing next to the open back. The load floor is impressively low, at least compared to a typical SUV. And the interior feels extremely spacious. It’s really a winning design overall.

I found the Aurora Green color dull, whether indoors or out. I have a little red-green color deficiency, but it didn’t look very green to me. It seemed more grey-brown.

The Gravity in the showroom had the Tahoe interior. It is very luxurious—beautiful and sumptuous. I really like the saddle brown color. And the other fabrics inside are so nice. There was an Air in the showroom with the base Mohave Purluxe interior; not a true apples-to-apples comparison, but I took a look just to get an idea what the base Gravity interior might be like. The Tahoe was SO much better in look and feel.

Seats are a critical issue for me in a car, so I scrutinized them a lot. I’m 5’3” and oddly proportioned (short torso and long arms), so seats (and clothing and sofas and just about everything else) is typically not designed to fit me. The Gravity seats are supremely supportive and the adjustments have a big range. Tall people will probably love them. Shorter people . . . maybe. The thigh extensions are obviously useless to me, but they did get (just) short enough for my legs, and they are kind of magic in the way that they “unroll” to extend without leaving any gap in the seat. The side bolsters are a mixed bag for shorter people like myself. When I moved them in, they held me firmly, but they come up much too high. So, they are really holding against my lats, and they restrict the motion of my arms. While I was looking around the vehicle, I overheard a very short woman (maybe 4’10”) sitting in the driver’s seat talking to her (much taller) husband. I didn’t hear her say anything specifically about the seat, but she hated the driving position, which required her to be much too close to the steering wheel in order to see over the dash and reach the pedals. I didn’t have that problem, but I did wish that the steering wheel could move a little further away from me (maybe another inch of travel).

Then, I tried the massage. In the first couple of modes, I thought “this is pretty nice.” Then I tried the “deep” mode. Oh, wow. It’s like a dozen firm hands pressing deeply into your back AND legs. If you get stiff or sore on long drives, you will want this. I ordered a GT with the base interior, but I now see that the upgraded ones are definitely worth it.

The center console looks very big, but despite its size, it couldn’t fit the bag that I usually carry with me. The cupholders were too small for my usual water bottle as well.

I didn’t get to try out the touch pads on the steering wheel, but the buttons on the touch pads are used to adjust things like the steering wheel and mirrors. They were one of the few bits in the vehicle that felt cheap and plasticy to me.

The Surreal Sound Pro audio system was good, but not nearly what I expect for a $3000 upgrade. The treble lacked a bit of clarity. There was too much mid-bass, making the sound a little muddy. And the sound over-emphasized the midrange a bit. There was not much deep bass, and if you turned it up, the sound became too boomy. The equalizer has only 3 bands, so there is no precision in the adjustment. My sense is that the system really needs more than just a adjustment in calibration or frequency response. It felt as though it needs more amplifier power, and maybe even better speaker drivers. It definitely sounded better than the base Surreal Sound system in the Air in the showroom, but I think that it should be better than it is.

If you’ve read this far . . .
with all of these positives and superlatives (and just a few criticisms), you would probably conclude that I will change my interior choice to the Tahoe leather and excitedly await delivery. But the test drive of Gravity gave me the most critical impression: I just did not enjoy driving it. The thing is just too big for me. Many test drivers have noted that it feels much smaller than it really is, and while it certainly did not feel as long as its measured length, I definitely noticed the width. The lower screen felt far away. The armrest in the door WAS very far away from me. And the right side of the vehicle looked and felt WAY out there.

I’m having a hard time describing what it felt like. A little like wearing a shirt that’s two sizes too big. I felt as though I were floating inside a big sphere, not really connected to it. I think that part of the feeling came from the visuals. All of the glass gives an expansive view, but the view is mostly “up.” With the high beltline and dash, I couldn’t see the ground anywhere near the vehicle. it was a little like looking over the bow of a boat and seeing the sky, but not the sea.

I’m no stranger to big vehicles. I grew up driving my family’s full-size, extended length van (1983 Plymouth Voyager), a 231-inch behemoth. That’s nearly 3 feet longer than Gravity, and at least as wide. I’ve driven vehicles ranging from subcompacts to a 26’ box truck. Not that I always enjoyed driving the giants, but it’s just to say that I’m capable of doing so. And I did drive the Gravity just fine around those city streets. But I felt very disconnected from it, as though I were piloting in remotely. Gravity has so much driving capability, but it was not comfortable or enjoyable for me to access it.

So, after all of the anticipation and waiting, I come away very disappointed that this is not my dream car, and not even something that I want to own. I’m going to cancel my Gravity order. I’ve decided to lease a Hyundai Ioniq 5 for 3 years. It’s not everything that I want, and it can’t match the dynamics of a Lucid. But it’s fast, fun to drive, meets most of my needs; and with the incentives and my trade-in, came to a very low lease payment. When it’s time to give the car back, there will be more options on the market, including Lucid’s midsize SUV. I hope that Lucid gives it the same meticulous attention to detail in design, packaging, and driving dynamics as the Gravity. If they do, then maybe that will be the vehicle of my dreams, and will yet become a Lucid owner.
 
That's an honest and refreshing viewpoint. Thanks for posting.

Personally, 'm still a "go" for a Gravity after my test drive, but have decided to wait out the early production runs for quality concerns, which will also let me get the Ojai interior color I really want, the HUD, and if I'm really lucky, maybe even a metal roof option and maybe a Zenith Red exterior color as later possibilities.
 
That's an honest and refreshing viewpoint. Thanks for posting.

Personally, 'm still a "go" for a Gravity after my test drive, but have decided to wait out the early production runs for quality concerns, which will also let me get the Ojai interior color I really want, the HUD, and if I'm really lucky, maybe even a metal roof option and maybe a Zenith Red exterior color as later possibilities.
That sounds like a good plan, though I don't know how likely it is for Gravity to ever get a metal roof or other colors. I'm not a fan of glass roofs either, and Zenith Red is my favorite Lucid color by far.
 
That sounds like a good plan, though I don't know how likely it is for Gravity to ever get a metal roof or other colors. I'm not a fan of glass roofs either, and Zenith Red is my favorite Lucid color by far.
You may well be right about Zenith Red not being an option, but I'd be willing to take a $5 bet that there WILL be a metal roof option in the next couple of years. I don't have any info of course, but I just see what seems to be an increasing popularity in the Air for the metal roof (cost? losing the "2-tone" appearance"? heat worries?)
Maybe I'll post a poll to see what other people think.
 
Interesting and thoughtful comments, thanks for posting.

When sitting in a stationary Gravity, I also had a feeling of being in a large bathtub due to the high beltline. It didn't turn out to be an issue on my very brief test drive, and I later realized it was about the same as the beltline in my Air, so - OK.

Gravity's overall size and lack of native Google maps are its main "minuses" for me. I'm not yet a fan of its appearance either. The Air is by far the largest daily driver I've ever owned, and I prefer something about a foot shorter with two rows of seats. I also have strongly mixed feelings about continuing down the "Lucid Experience" path, with its glory, frustrations, and occasional lost sleep.

That said, the alternatives I've investigated have not been more appealing overall (Macan EV, Rivian R2, Polestar 3). I'm OK with waiting for Gravity to ship with HUD, and to let several thousand units come off the assembly line before mine. Maybe by then, details on Range Rover's EV will be available. In the meantime, Gravity's EPA range and comfort are fantastic and are the main reasons I'm still onboard.
 
Last edited:
Interesting and thoughtful comments, thanks for posting.

When sitting in a stationary Gravity, I also had a feeling of being in a large bathtub due to the high beltline. It didn't turn out to be an issue on my very brief test drive, and I later realized it was about the same as the beltline in my Air, so - OK.

Gravity's overall size and lack of native Google maps are its main "minuses" for me. I'm not yet a fan of its appearance either. The Air is by far the largest daily driver I've ever owned, and I prefer something about a foot shorter with two rows of seats. I also have strongly mixed feelings about continuing down the "Lucid Experience" path, with its glory, frustrations, and occasional lost sleep.

That said, the alternatives I've investigated have not been more appealing overall (Macan EV, Rivian R2, Polestar 3). I'm OK with waiting for Gravity to ship with HUD, and to let several thousand units come off the assembly line before mine. Maybe by then, details on Range Rover's EV will be available. In the meantime, Gravity's EPA range and comfort are fantastic and are the main reasons I'm still onboard.
I'm right with you on the size, and I too have no use for a third row of seats. As I've mentioned in other threads, my ideal in terms of the size and form factor is the Subaru Outback. But there is no EV equivalent right now, and I've come to like the elegance of my Audi. The Lucid Gravity was so exciting that I wanted to give it a chance despite the size. I'm sad that I wasn't comfortable driving it because it's so nice inside that I didn't want to get out.
 
I'm right with you on the size, and I too have no use for a third row of seats. As I've mentioned in other threads, my ideal in terms of the size and form factor is the Subaru Outback. But there is no EV equivalent right now, and I've come to like the elegance of my Audi. The Lucid Gravity was so exciting that I wanted to give it a chance despite the size. I'm sad that I wasn't comfortable driving it because it's so nice inside that I didn't want to get out.
Understood. It was a great fit for me. My wife commented on how comfortable it was for her, even compared to the very-comfortable Polestar 3. Gravity was just a class above. I'll likely be looking at the Midsize in a few years as well.
 
Understood. It was a great fit for me. My wife commented on how comfortable it was for her, even compared to the very-comfortable Polestar 3. Gravity was just a class above. I'll likely be looking at the Midsize in a few years as well.
I'm hoping that the midsize has the same level of luxury as Gravity. I would be disappointed if Lucid cheapens the interior and cuts features to achieve a low price point. Keep that dynamic handling package! I would gladly pay $70k for an 80%-size equivalent of Gravity.
 
Like several other forum members, I test drove the Gravity at the Tyson’s Corner event last week. I wanted to share my thoughts and perspectives.

First, as some have noted, the test drive sucked. We went on a set route on some city streets around the moll. It lasted much less than 20 minutes, and I swear that I spent half of it stopped at red lights. I got hardly any sense of the vehicles dynamics. A few things that I was able to glean: Gravity was very quick to respond to steering inputs. The ride was very smooth and quiet, even on the 22/23” wheels (though this was at low speeds on relatively smooth roads). The couple of times I was able to press the accelerator a bit more, I got a little sense of the great power delivery. I felt the mass of the car in a good way as a strong push against my back. One-pedal driving was fantastic—the regen was strong, seamless, intuitive, and easy to control. I’m still not sold on the squircle steering wheel. I like that I could set it low, and it doesn’t block the view of the screen, but grabbing the top of the “wheel” as I normally do when making a turn on a city street felt very awkward to me. The turn signal stalk was a little too far behind the wheel, and it required a long throw past a heavy detent to fully engage. I usually ended up just flashing the turn signal, not completely turning it on. The windshield extending over your head is a cool effect, though it’s odd to have the sun visor running across the view. The day was completely overcast, so I couldn’t tell if it would bother me to have the sun shining down from overhead while I drive.

As for the non-driving impressions:

Gravity looks great in-person. It makes sense to call in an SUV because that’s exactly how it functions—sport and utility. It just breaks the rules for what an SUV should look like, as it incorporates elements that are similar to SUVs, minivans, and wagons. The wheelbase still looks a little too long to me, but it’s beautiful overall. I especially noticed how low the roof was when standing next to the open back. The load floor is impressively low, at least compared to a typical SUV. And the interior feels extremely spacious. It’s really a winning design overall.

I found the Aurora Green color dull, whether indoors or out. I have a little red-green color deficiency, but it didn’t look very green to me. It seemed more grey-brown.

The Gravity in the showroom had the Tahoe interior. It is very luxurious—beautiful and sumptuous. I really like the saddle brown color. And the other fabrics inside are so nice. There was an Air in the showroom with the base Mohave Purluxe interior; not a true apples-to-apples comparison, but I took a look just to get an idea what the base Gravity interior might be like. The Tahoe was SO much better in look and feel.

Seats are a critical issue for me in a car, so I scrutinized them a lot. I’m 5’3” and oddly proportioned (short torso and long arms), so seats (and clothing and sofas and just about everything else) is typically not designed to fit me. The Gravity seats are supremely supportive and the adjustments have a big range. Tall people will probably love them. Shorter people . . . maybe. The thigh extensions are obviously useless to me, but they did get (just) short enough for my legs, and they are kind of magic in the way that they “unroll” to extend without leaving any gap in the seat. The side bolsters are a mixed bag for shorter people like myself. When I moved them in, they held me firmly, but they come up much too high. So, they are really holding against my lats, and they restrict the motion of my arms. While I was looking around the vehicle, I overheard a very short woman (maybe 4’10”) sitting in the driver’s seat talking to her (much taller) husband. I didn’t hear her say anything specifically about the seat, but she hated the driving position, which required her to be much too close to the steering wheel in order to see over the dash and reach the pedals. I didn’t have that problem, but I did wish that the steering wheel could move a little further away from me (maybe another inch of travel).

Then, I tried the massage. In the first couple of modes, I thought “this is pretty nice.” Then I tried the “deep” mode. Oh, wow. It’s like a dozen firm hands pressing deeply into your back AND legs. If you get stiff or sore on long drives, you will want this. I ordered a GT with the base interior, but I now see that the upgraded ones are definitely worth it.

The center console looks very big, but despite its size, it couldn’t fit the bag that I usually carry with me. The cupholders were too small for my usual water bottle as well.

I didn’t get to try out the touch pads on the steering wheel, but the buttons on the touch pads are used to adjust things like the steering wheel and mirrors. They were one of the few bits in the vehicle that felt cheap and plasticy to me.

The Surreal Sound Pro audio system was good, but not nearly what I expect for a $3000 upgrade. The treble lacked a bit of clarity. There was too much mid-bass, making the sound a little muddy. And the sound over-emphasized the midrange a bit. There was not much deep bass, and if you turned it up, the sound became too boomy. The equalizer has only 3 bands, so there is no precision in the adjustment. My sense is that the system really needs more than just a adjustment in calibration or frequency response. It felt as though it needs more amplifier power, and maybe even better speaker drivers. It definitely sounded better than the base Surreal Sound system in the Air in the showroom, but I think that it should be better than it is.

If you’ve read this far . . .
with all of these positives and superlatives (and just a few criticisms), you would probably conclude that I will change my interior choice to the Tahoe leather and excitedly await delivery. But the test drive of Gravity gave me the most critical impression: I just did not enjoy driving it. The thing is just too big for me. Many test drivers have noted that it feels much smaller than it really is, and while it certainly did not feel as long as its measured length, I definitely noticed the width. The lower screen felt far away. The armrest in the door WAS very far away from me. And the right side of the vehicle looked and felt WAY out there.

I’m having a hard time describing what it felt like. A little like wearing a shirt that’s two sizes too big. I felt as though I were floating inside a big sphere, not really connected to it. I think that part of the feeling came from the visuals. All of the glass gives an expansive view, but the view is mostly “up.” With the high beltline and dash, I couldn’t see the ground anywhere near the vehicle. it was a little like looking over the bow of a boat and seeing the sky, but not the sea.

I’m no stranger to big vehicles. I grew up driving my family’s full-size, extended length van (1983 Plymouth Voyager), a 231-inch behemoth. That’s nearly 3 feet longer than Gravity, and at least as wide. I’ve driven vehicles ranging from subcompacts to a 26’ box truck. Not that I always enjoyed driving the giants, but it’s just to say that I’m capable of doing so. And I did drive the Gravity just fine around those city streets. But I felt very disconnected from it, as though I were piloting in remotely. Gravity has so much driving capability, but it was not comfortable or enjoyable for me to access it.

So, after all of the anticipation and waiting, I come away very disappointed that this is not my dream car, and not even something that I want to own. I’m going to cancel my Gravity order. I’ve decided to lease a Hyundai Ioniq 5 for 3 years. It’s not everything that I want, and it can’t match the dynamics of a Lucid. But it’s fast, fun to drive, meets most of my needs; and with the incentives and my trade-in, came to a very low lease payment. When it’s time to give the car back, there will be more options on the market, including Lucid’s midsize SUV. I hope that Lucid gives it the same meticulous attention to detail in design, packaging, and driving dynamics as the Gravity. If they do, then maybe that will be the vehicle of my dreams, and will yet become a Lucid owner.
Two things: Base interior reportedly does NOT include massaging seats NOR the back mounted tray tables in the second row. Also Subaru just announced an EV "outback style" vehicle called a "Trailseeker", though it's probably 2026 or 2027 before its available
 
I think Tysons suffers for decent test drive options. It's all traffic around there almost all of the time. Honestly, I don't know where they could take someone less than an hour out that wouldn't be. I don't know what they can do about it, but I am sure it hurts them when one of their main selling features is driving dynamics. Basically, if you test drive at Tysons, you just have to trust Lucid on that part of the value proposition.
 
... In the meantime, Gravity's EPA range and comfort are fantastic and are the main reasons I'm still onboard.
There's many aspects of the Gravity that I like. But the range is the number one appeal for me. Seating comfort is number 2, and cargo volume is number 3. I don't care at all about the third row, but I travel with a couple of dogs, and the cargo space for them is a huge appeal. Performance is great, but I'd give that up if there was a "mid market" vehicle that otherwise met my needs.
 
Two things: Base interior reportedly does NOT include massaging seats NOR the back mounted tray tables in the second row. Also Subaru just announced an EV "outback style" vehicle called a "Trailseeker", though it's probably 2026 or 2027 before its available
Exactly right about the base interior. That's why I would have upgraded to the Tahoe interior if I were buying a Gravity--the massage seats and the much nicer materials. I've read about the Trailseeker. I love Subaru, and while the size seems just right for me, it's disappointing overall. I might be able to get past the ugly appearance, but its EV technology (range, efficiency, charging speed, etc.) is already 5 years out of date, it the vehicle is still 2 years away. I'll probably take a look when it arrives, but I'm not very hopeful that I'll like it.
 
Thanks for your impressions, @HaltheAerialist. Yours is a balanced review and I appreciate it. It is forcing me to look deeper into my own impressions of Gravity to make sure I am not myself getting carried away by hype. Thanks for the reality check.

I'm also happy for you that you seem to have reached a conclusion that, while maybe disappointing or unexpected, is the right one for you.

As for the test drive locations - It's just occurring to me that Lucid could have held these test drives at 3rd-party venues more conducive to driving. They did so for the press day - it's a shame they didn't figure out a way to do this for customers. I know it would have been more expensive and logistically difficult to source locations around the country, but in hindsight I really think they should have. I know there are many barriers (site needs charging infrastructure, it's harder to staff a satellite location while keeping the doors open at the local showroom, you'd need a touring setup to show interiors etc) and that Lucid's marketing staff is apparently pretty small. And I guess it's hard to handicap the ROI on it (are people who signed up for a test drive more or less likely to buy after a great test drive vs. a blah one?). But man, they could have held this somewhere even out of a parking lot in NoVa where you got to go around a few country roads and a stretch of highway in the same 20 minutes.....
 
...I love Subaru, and while the size seems just right for me, it's disappointing overall. I might be able to get past the ugly appearance, but its EV technology (range, efficiency, charging speed, etc.) is already 5 years out of date, it the vehicle is still 2 years away. I'll probably take a look when it arrives, but I'm not very hopeful that I'll like it.
That's the conclusion I came to with the Macan EV and Polestar 3. For the most part, they are "just another EV" with only one or two strong positive characteristics relative to Gravity, and a number of negatives.
 
Thanks for your impressions, @HaltheAerialist. Yours is a balanced review and I appreciate it. It is forcing me to look deeper into my own impressions of Gravity to make sure I am not myself getting carried away by hype. Thanks for the reality check.

I'm also happy for you that you seem to have reached a conclusion that, while maybe disappointing or unexpected, is the right one for you.

As for the test drive locations - It's just occurring to me that Lucid could have held these test drives at 3rd-party venues more conducive to driving. They did so for the press day - it's a shame they didn't figure out a way to do this for customers. I know it would have been more expensive and logistically difficult to source locations around the country, but in hindsight I really think they should have. I know there are many barriers (site needs charging infrastructure, it's harder to staff a satellite location while keeping the doors open at the local showroom, you'd need a touring setup to show interiors etc) and that Lucid's marketing staff is apparently pretty small. And I guess it's hard to handicap the ROI on it (are people who signed up for a test drive more or less likely to buy after a great test drive vs. a blah one?). But man, they could have held this somewhere even out of a parking lot in NoVa where you got to go around a few country roads and a stretch of highway in the same 20 minutes.....
Yes, there were certainly better locations in the VA area they could have chosen. The drive was VERY much boring and told me practically nothing about the car at Tysons. Glad i had airline points to only pay $15 for my tickets to go up there. The showroom floor model was well worth my time tho as getting time to play around and feel the vehicle really helped settle me in on this vehicle choice. Ultimately, Lucid has got to expand their stores around the country. We have nothing really in the southeast as far as TN, AL, NC, SC and GA go. Even the ones in FL are WAAAYY down there. Would like to see them open shop in ATL and Nashville areas at least.
 
thank you for the great review.

It’s interesting because @joec’s wife is vertically challenged and had no problem getting comfortable but bodies are all different.

Separately, share some aerial work!! :) one of my close friends is an aerialist too. :)
 
Thanks for your impressions, @HaltheAerialist. Yours is a balanced review and I appreciate it. It is forcing me to look deeper into my own impressions of Gravity to make sure I am not myself getting carried away by hype. Thanks for the reality check.

I'm also happy for you that you seem to have reached a conclusion that, while maybe disappointing or unexpected, is the right one for you.

As for the test drive locations - It's just occurring to me that Lucid could have held these test drives at 3rd-party venues more conducive to driving. They did so for the press day - it's a shame they didn't figure out a way to do this for customers. I know it would have been more expensive and logistically difficult to source locations around the country, but in hindsight I really think they should have. I know there are many barriers (site needs charging infrastructure, it's harder to staff a satellite location while keeping the doors open at the local showroom, you'd need a touring setup to show interiors etc) and that Lucid's marketing staff is apparently pretty small. And I guess it's hard to handicap the ROI on it (are people who signed up for a test drive more or less likely to buy after a great test drive vs. a blah one?). But man, they could have held this somewhere even out of a parking lot in NoVa where you got to go around a few country roads and a stretch of highway in the same 20 minutes.....

Yes, there were certainly better locations in the VA area they could have chosen. The drive was VERY much boring and told me practically nothing about the car at Tysons. Glad i had airline points to only pay $15 for my tickets to go up there. The showroom floor model was well worth my time tho as getting time to play around and feel the vehicle really helped settle me in on this vehicle choice. Ultimately, Lucid has got to expand their stores around the country. We have nothing really in the southeast as far as TN, AL, NC, SC and GA go. Even the ones in FL are WAAAYY down there. Would like to see them open shop in ATL and Nashville areas at least.
I agree about the locations. The logistics would be more difficult, but someplace outside a city would have been much better. At Tyson's, they could have at least set the route to put us on the highway for a few minutes. I also hope that Lucid opens studios outside of the biggest metropolitan areas. I can understand their logic in starting there first, hoping to attract the most customers. But Tyson's is a 12-hour round-trip drive for me, and its my closest studio location. They have service centers in Charlotte and Hickory, NC (each about 2 hours away), so here's hoping that they open some more southeast Studio locations soon. There is a sizeable market for EVs here. Teslas are ubiquitous, and I'm seeing more and more Hyundai, Kia, and Rivian EVs too.
 
I'm in Phx, one of the hottest cities on the planet but only about an hour from the factory in Casa Grande, AZ. I hate glass roofs in cars. They heat up and radiate that heat onto your head after sitting in a parking lot. I would have the glass roof wrapped in white, silver, or same color as body paint. I really want to test drive a Gravity, but they are not available yet in showrooms (or at the factory, apparently...).
For those who also own Teslas or Rivians: Is the response of the accelerator more like Tesla (very responsive) or more like Rivan (squishy so that you really need to floor it to get moving)?
 
For those who also own Teslas or Rivians: Is the response of the accelerator more like Tesla (very responsive) or more like Rivan (squishy so that you really need to floor it to get moving)?
I have owned two Teslas and only test drove Rivian a couple of times. Air's accelerator is definitely firmer than Tesla's, but in a good way, haptics speaking. I would not call it "squishy" though.
 
Back
Top